Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Does Makeham Make Sense?

6 references·7 citing·33 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2017The Structure of Scientific Revolutions5,397 cited
1825XXIV. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. In a letter to Francis Baily, Esq. F. R. S. &c3,817 cited
1860On the Law of Mortality and the Construction of Annuity Tables465 cited
1990Longitudinal gompertzian analysis of adult mortality in the U.S., 1900–198693 cited
2001The new trends in survival improvement require a revision of traditional gerontological concepts85 cited
2002New age patterns of survival improvement in Sweden: do they characterize changes in individual aging?59 cited

Cited by

2012Trends in scale and shape of survival curves33 cited
2016Evolutionary theory of ageing and the problem of correlated Gompertz parameters33 cited
2012Discussing the Strehler-Mildvan model of mortality23 cited
2019A 2D analysis of correlations between the parameters of the Gompertz–Makeham model (or law?) of relationships between aging, mortality, and longevity22 cited
2015The Strehler–Mildvan correlation from the perspective of a two-process vitality model17 cited
2008Makeham’s addition to the Gompertz law re-evaluated13 cited
2015An informative prior probability distribution of the gompertz parameters for bayesian approaches in paleodemography13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work