SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Experienced journal reviewers' perceptions of and engagement with the task of reviewing: an Australian perspective
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Experienced journal reviewers' perceptions of and engagement with the task of reviewing: an Australian perspective (2013)Experienced journal reviewers' perception…The Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process (2009)The Air We Breathe: A Critica…Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) (2003)Qualitative Research and Eval…The history of the peer-review process (2002)The history of the peer-revie…Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Effects of Editorial Peer Rev…Interpreting Qualitative Data Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction (1997)Interpreting Qualitative Data…Researching Social Life (1994)Researching Social LifePeer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable (1994)Peer review. Crude and unders…Peer Review (1994)Peer ReviewFacts and Myths about Refereeing (1994)Facts and Myths about Referee…The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)The Evolution of Editorial Pe…Scientific excellence: Origins and assessment (1988)Scientific excellence: Origin…Journal Peer Review (1985)Journal Peer ReviewQualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Qualitative research and eval…Peer review and publication. Presidential address before the 70th annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Investigation, San Francisco, California, 30 April 1978. (1978)Peer review and publication. …Contemporary Sociology (1932)Contemporary SociologyTHE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN (1951)Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers (1979)Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)The ups and downs of peer review (2007)Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes: The Case of Interaction Research (2011)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)A Descriptive and Historical Review of Bibliometrics with Applications to Medical Sciences (2015)Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review (2007)The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals (2019)Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review (1994)Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research (2007)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research (2013)Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method (2002)Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research (2003)What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research (2019)Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. (2014)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Misinformation in and about science (2021)Scientific peer review (2011)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research (2001)Techniques to Identify Themes (2003)Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects (2004)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1980Qualitative research and evaluation methods35,808 cited
  • 2003Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.)10,488 cited
  • 1997Interpreting Qualitative Data Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction6,866 cited
  • 1994Researching Social Life1,735 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals794 cited
  • 2002The history of the peer-review process445 cited
  • 2002Effects of Editorial Peer Review347 cited
  • 1990The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review346 cited
  • 1994Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable235 cited
  • 1985Journal Peer Review163 cited
  • 1994Peer Review155 cited
  • 1994Facts and Myths about Refereeing147 cited
  • 1932Contemporary Sociology137 cited
  • 1988Scientific excellence: Origins and assessment121 cited
  • 1978Peer review and publication. Presidential address before the 70th annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Investigation, San Francisco, California, 30 April 1978.104 cited
  • 2009The Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

85 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.