SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Anonymous reviewing and the peer-review process.
2 references·1 citing·12 second hop
Anonymous reviewing and the peer-review process. (1986)Anonymous reviewing and the peer-review p…Psychologist heal thyself: What is available for the impaired psychologist? (1985)Psychologist heal thyself: Wh…How blind is blind review? (1984)How blind is blind review?The Use of Double Anonymity in Peer Review: A Decision Whose Time Has Come? (2005)The Use of Double Anonymity i…The scientific publication system in social science (1978)Manuscript characteristics influencing reviewers' decisions. (1980)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Creativity research: Originality, utility, and integration (1988)The Review Process at PSPB: Correlates of Interreviewer Agreement and Manuscript Acceptance (1999)The cases for and against double-blind reviews (2019)Betrayers of the Truth (1982)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)The peer‐review process (2002)Stress and coping in clinical psychologists (1994)Distress and professional impairment due to mental health problems among psychotherapists (1996)Problematic Students: Gatekeeping Practices of Academic Professional Psychology Programs. (2004)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1984How blind is blind review?125 cited
  • 1985Psychologist heal thyself: What is available for the impaired psychologist?84 cited

Cited by

  • 2005The Use of Double Anonymity in Peer Review: A Decision Whose Time Has Come?8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work