SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
English consonant recognition in noise and in reverberation by Japanese and American listeners
0 references·16 citing·47 second hopsampled
English consonant recognition in noise and in reverberation by Japanese and American listeners (1990)English consonant recognition in noise an…Listening Effort During Sentence Processing Is Increased for Non-native Listeners: A Pupillometry Study (2018)Listening Effort During Sente…Spoken-word recognition in foreign-accented speech by L2 listeners (2011)Spoken-word recognition in fo…Speech perception in noise by monolingual, bilingual and trilingual listeners (2010)Speech perception in noise by…Similarity and familiarity: Second language sentence recognition in first- and second-language multi-talker babble (2010)Similarity and familiarity: S…Perception of Acoustically Degraded Sentences in Bilingual Listeners Who Differ in Age of English Acquisition (2010)Perception of Acoustically De…Normal-hearing English-as-a-second-language listeners’ recognition of English words in competing signals (2009)Normal-hearing English-as-a-s…Native-language benefit for understanding speech-in-noise: The contribution of semantics (2009)Native-language benefit for u…Influence of native language phonetic system on audio-visual speech perception (2009)Influence of native language …Infants’ listening in multitalker environments: Effect of the number of background talkers (2009)Infants’ listening in multita…Perception of Dialect Variation in Noise: Intelligibility and Classification (2008)Perception of Dialect Variati…Linguistic experience and audio-visual perception of non-native fricatives (2008)Linguistic experience and aud…Consonant identification in noise by native and non-native listeners: Effects of local context (2008)Consonant identification in n…Effect of background noise on perception of English speech for Japanese listeners (2002)Effect of background noise on…The Effect of Cue-Enhancement on Consonant Intelligibility in Noise: Speaker and Listener Effects (2000)The Effect of Cue-Enhancement…Age of Second-Language Acquisition and Perception of Speech in Noise (1997)Age of Second-Language Acquis…Production of the word-final English /t/–/d/ contrast by native speakers of English, Mandarin, and Spanish (1992)Production of the word-final …Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English (1960)A First Language (1973)The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification (1987)LEARNING SECOND LANGUAGE SUPRASEGMENTALS: Effect of L2 Experience on Prosody and Fluency Characteristics of L2 Speech (2006)Pronunciation Fundamentals (2015)The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r) (2021)Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language (1989)Simultaneous Bilingualism and the Perception of a Language-Specific Vowel Contrast in the First Year of Life (2003)How can speech-language therapists and audiologists enhance language and literacy outcomes in South Africa? (And why we urgently need to) (2011)Novel Word Learning in Children Who Are Bilingual: Comparison to Monolingual Peers (2019)Why listening in background noise is harder in a non-native language than in a native language: A review (2019)An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants (1955)The Atlas of North American English (2005)Comprehension of Familiar and Unfamiliar Native Accents under Adverse Listening Conditions (2009)Television Can Also be a Factor in Language Change: Evidence from an Urban Dialect (2013)I Don't Like You Because You're Hard to Understand: The Role of Processing Fluency in the Language Attitudes Process (2016)Elements of General Phonetics (2019)Interaction of information in word recognition. (1969)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Increase in Speech Recognition due to Linguistic Mismatch Between Target and Masker Speech: Monolingual and Simultaneous Bilingual Performance (2013)The effect of background noise on the word activation process in nonnative spoken-word recognition. (2017)The Lombard Sign and the Role of Hearing in Speech (1971)A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception (1995)The clear speech effect for non-native listeners (2002)Trends and Directions in Computer-Assisted Pronunciation Training (2015)Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis (1999)Constraints of Lexical Stress on Lexical Access in English: Evidence from Native and Non-native Listeners (2002)Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review (2012)Bilingual perceptual benefits of experience with a heritage language (2014)The English Lexicon Project (2007)Native and non-native listeners’ perception of English consonants in different types of noise (2010)Raspberry, not a car: context predictability and a phonological advantage in early and late learners’ processing of speech in noise (2014)Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers (2001)Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers (2001)A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise (2006)The influence of non-native language proficiency on speech perception performance (2014)The Oxford Handbook of the Mental Lexicon (2022)The Biological Foundations of Language (1967)Linguistic Experience Alters Phonetic Perception in Infants by 6 Months of Age (1992)Infants′ Sensitivity to the Sound Patterns of Native Language Words (1993)Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems (2003)The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit (2003)The children's test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological working memory (1994)Age Constraints on Second-Language Acquisition (1999)A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes (2002)Pupil Dilation Is Sensitive to Semantic Ambiguity and Acoustic Degradation (2020)Rapid adaptation to fully intelligible nonnative-accented speech reduces listening effort (2020)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1997Age of Second-Language Acquisition and Perception of Speech in Noise459 cited
  • 1992Production of the word-final English /t/–/d/ contrast by native speakers of English, Mandarin, and Spanish134 cited
  • 2008Perception of Dialect Variation in Noise: Intelligibility and Classification133 cited
  • 2010Similarity and familiarity: Second language sentence recognition in first- and second-language multi-talker babble118 cited
  • 2018Listening Effort During Sentence Processing Is Increased for Non-native Listeners: A Pupillometry Study102 cited
  • 2010Speech perception in noise by monolingual, bilingual and trilingual listeners101 cited
  • 2008Consonant identification in noise by native and non-native listeners: Effects of local context98 cited
  • 2009Native-language benefit for understanding speech-in-noise: The contribution of semantics87 cited
  • 2010Perception of Acoustically Degraded Sentences in Bilingual Listeners Who Differ in Age of English Acquisition83 cited
  • 2000The Effect of Cue-Enhancement on Consonant Intelligibility in Noise: Speaker and Listener Effects60 cited
  • 2008Linguistic experience and audio-visual perception of non-native fricatives48 cited
  • 2009Normal-hearing English-as-a-second-language listeners’ recognition of English words in competing signals47 cited
  • 2011Spoken-word recognition in foreign-accented speech by L2 listeners

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

47 cited
  • 2009Influence of native language phonetic system on audio-visual speech perception45 cited
  • 2002Effect of background noise on perception of English speech for Japanese listeners44 cited
  • 2009Infants’ listening in multitalker environments: Effect of the number of background talkers43 cited