“You're barking mad, I'm out”: Impoliteness and broadcast talk

Nuria Lorenzo-Dus

86 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Politeness Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Linguistics and Language Analysis

Abstract

This paper examines impoliteness in a discourse context marked by double articulation (i. e., broadcasting), specifically in the television show Dragons' Den (BBC2, UK). Like past work on impoliteness within ‘exploitative’ reality television, this study explores face-threatening behaviour by those involved in the interaction within the studio. Analysis of five hours of broadcast material reveals a number of patterns underlying both the interactional structure of impoliteness containing sequences and the linguistic realizations of impoliteness in Dragons' Den . These patterns point to a clear interactional power imbalance between the expert (‘the dragon’) and lay (the contestant) person in the studio. They also highlight the interactional power held by the show's presenter, whose voice-overs set the interactions against the contestant, dictate their development and, importantly, close off impoliteness containing sequences in such a way that the dragon invariably has the upper hand. In addition, and unlike any other study to date, this paper links the findings of the discursive realization of impoliteness in Dragons' Den to viewer interpretations of impoliteness within two representative samples from the corpus. Responses (N = 85) to a questionnaire on (im)politeness show high agreement levels regarding assessment of dragon and contestant behaviour. They also suggest, however, that isolated instances of marked face-threatening behaviour determine overall scores of impoliteness for given speakers and that individual speakers are seen as more or less impolite depending on their co-interactants' behaviour. What is more, respondents' reasons for their assessments reveal the importance of local and cultural norms in ascribing impoliteness to certain communicative behaviour.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 86 citations exist upstream.

References

2006Polite behavior within relational work: The discursive approach to politeness 1989The limits of politeness: therapeutic and courtroom discourse 2003Anticipated versus inferred politeness

Cited by

2018Globalization, transnational identities, and conflict talk: The superdiversity and complexity of the Latino identity 2018Ludic impoliteness and globalisation on Twitter: ‘I speak England very best’ #agglika_Tsipra, #Tsipras #Clinton 2016Mock Politeness in English and Italian 2019Conversational Humour and (Im)politeness 2019Arabic audiovisual translation of taboo words in American hip hop movies 2013‘No eres inteligente ni para tener amigos… Pues anda que tú’ [‘You are not even clever enough to have any friends… Look who’s talking!’]: a quantitative analysis of the production and reception of impoliteness in present-day Spanish reality television 2018Accusations and interpersonal conflict in televised multi-party interactions amongst speakers of (Argentinian and Peninsular) Spanish 2015“There’s definitely gonna be some serious carnage in this house” or how to be genuinely impolite inBig BrotherUK

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.