Logos Ethos and Pathos in Political Discourse

Tamar Mshvenieradze

36 citations0/0 files storedTheory and Practice in Language Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Rhetoric and Communication Studies Cultural and political discourse analysis

Abstract

Given article aims at underlining all linguistic means out of the discourses of 2002 and 2007 presidential candidates Jacques Chirac and Nicolas Sarkozy that served as the Triad of Aristotle argumentation -Logos, Ethos, and Pathos -without which it is impossible to build any type of argumentative written, verbal, and/or as in our case, political discourses.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 36 citations exist upstream.

References

2002Dictionnaire d'analyse du discours 2021L'argumentation dans le discours 1987The place of emotion in argument 1999Images de soi dans le discours : la construction de l'éthos 1980Les échelles argumentatives 2003Compte-rendu de lecture de : « Ruth Amossy : Images de soi dans le discours. La construction de l'ethos. Paris - Lausanne : Delachaux et Niestlé, 1999. »1988Le discours politique 1993Le contexte de l'œuvre littéraire : énonciation, écrivain, société

Cited by

2020Using Rhetorical Approach of Ethos, Pathos and Logos by Malaysian Engineering Students in Persuasive Email Writings 2015Eating words: a discourse historical analysis of the public debate over India’s 2013 National Food Security Act

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.