SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
THE TECHNOLOGICAL OBSOLESCENCE OF SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
11 references·4 citing·39 second hop
THE TECHNOLOGICAL OBSOLESCENCE OF SCIENTIFIC FRAUD (1996)THE TECHNOLOGICAL OBSOLESCENCE OF SCIENTI…Entrepreneurship, Social Mobility, and Income Redistribution in South India (2016)Entrepreneurship, Social Mobi…Integrity and Misconduct in Research (1996)Integrity and Misconduct in R…What Is Misconduct in Science? (1993)What Is Misconduct in Science?The market for (ir)reproducible econometrics (1993)The market for (ir)reproducib…The Definition of Misconduct in Science: A View from NSF (1993)The Definition of Misconduct …Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct (1990)Underreporting Research Is Sc…The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Existence of Publication …The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature (1990)The Continued Use of Retracte…Correcting the Literature Following Fraudulent Publication (1990)Correcting the Literature Fol…Data Mining as an Industry (1985)Data Mining as an IndustryPublication Decisions and Tests of Significance--A Comment (1959)Publication Decisions and Tes…Ausmaß und Risikofaktoren des Publication Bias in der deutschen Soziologie (2014)Ausmaß und Risikofaktoren des…Coping with Unpleasant Surprises in a Complex World: Is Rational Choice Possible in a World with Positive Information Costs? (2011)Coping with Unpleasant Surpri…How to Improve Forensic Science (2005)How to Improve Forensic Scien…Statistical prejudice: from eugenics to immigrants (2004)Statistical prejudice: from e…The Republic of science (1962)The Adapted Mind (1992)From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization (2001)Epistemic Systems (2006)Epistemics for Forensics (2008)Scientific integrity in the forensic sciences: Consumerism, conflicts of interest, and transparency (2019)Misrepresentation and Responsibility in Medical Research (1987)Analysis of Citations to Biomedical Articles Affected by Scientific Misconduct (2009)The problem of plagiarism (2010)Fate of Articles That Warranted Retraction Due to Ethical Concerns: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study (2014)Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process. (1996)Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished? (1999)A Review of the Types of Scientific Misconduct in Biomedical Research (2008)Is it time to revise the definition of research misconduct? (2019)Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)Compensating Wage Differentials and Unobserved Productivity (1992)Do Energy Prices Respond to U.S. Macroeconomic News? A Test of the Hypothesis of Predetermined Energy Prices (2010)Exploratory Research (2020)Survey of current business (1921)The sociology of science (1973)An empirical comparison of published replication research in accounting, economics, finance, management, and marketing (1996)Understanding Internet Usage (2001)Increasing Replication for Knowledge Accumulation in Strategy Research (2003)Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project (2016)The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (1934)The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life (1983)Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation (1995)Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes? (2006)Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries (1999)Ethics in engineering practice and research (2012)Scientific dishonesty—a nationwide survey of doctoral students in Norway (2013)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis (2001)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes? (2006)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)Registering Clinical Trials (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Entrepreneurship, Social Mobility, and Income Redistribution in South India1,530 cited
  • 1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence1,413 cited
  • 1990Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct552 cited
  • 1990The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature188 cited
  • 1985Data Mining as an Industry127 cited
  • 1993The market for (ir)reproducible econometrics111 cited
  • 1993The Definition of Misconduct in Science: A View from NSF80 cited
  • 1990Correcting the Literature Following Fraudulent Publication72 cited
  • 1993What Is Misconduct in Science?58 cited
  • 1959Publication Decisions and Tests of Significance--A Comment51 cited
  • 1996Integrity and Misconduct in Research46 cited

Cited by

  • 2005How to Improve Forensic Science77 cited
  • 2004Statistical prejudice: from eugenics to immigrants29 cited
  • 2014Ausmaß und Risikofaktoren des Publication Bias in der deutschen Soziologie14 cited
  • 2011Coping with Unpleasant Surprises in a Complex World: Is Rational Choice Possible in a World with Positive Information Costs?1 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work