Doctors with difficulties: why so few women?

Abstract

The National Clinical Assessment Service (NCAS), an NHS organisation that assesses doctors and dentists referred to them because of perceived difficulties, has produced a report describing data arising from its first 4 years, showing that male doctors were referred to the service considerably more often than female doctors. Despite women accounting for 42% of the general practitioner medical workforce and 37% of the medical hospital and community (H&C) workforce in 2004, only 13% of GPs and 20% of H&C NCAS referrals were women. When the H&C data were split into specialties, women were under-represented proportionally in all specialties. This paper offers a review of possible reasons for these gender differences and in doing so contributes to the debates concerning problems in performance and also the costs of employing a growing proportion of women doctors. Firstly, it hypothesises that the NCAS data may be non-representative of similar agency data, but finds that in disciplinary organisations of various types around the world, men are consistently over-represented. Secondly, it suggests that perhaps men are referred to such agencies more often than women because their employers are more lenient on women. There is no evidence for this, and it requires primary research to investigate it further. Finally, it considers gender differences in the attributes, beyond technical skills, that underpin a good doctor-patient relationship and finds that, on these attributes, women usually excel over men. In addition, far fewer women are disciplined for addiction. The implications of this for education and rehabilitation are considered. It concludes that any analysis of the economic costs of employing a greater proportion of female doctors must take into account the higher costs of men's litigation, discipline and retraining.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 38 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.