On replicating the slip technique: A reply to Sinsabaugh and Fox

Michael T. Motley

4 citations0/0 files storedCommunication Monographs

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Memory Processes and Influences Deception detection and forensic psychology

Abstract

Concerns raised about the SLIP technique by Sinsabaugh and Fox (1986) in their replication of Baars, Motley, and MacKay (1975, Experiment 1) are examined here via yet another replication of the Baars et al. experiment. Results indicate the Sinsabaugh and Fox concerns generally to be unfounded. Implications for optimal utilization of the SLIP technique are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 4 citations exist upstream.

References

2012Communication Yearbook 19 1986The internal structure of word-initial consonant clusters

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.