Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The judgment of contingency and the nature of the response alternatives.

5 references·16 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1973Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability9,980 cited
1967Man as an intuitive statistician.966 cited
1965Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes.580 cited
1976The cognitive side of probability learning.331 cited
1965The display of information and the judgment of contingency.311 cited

Cited by

1996Illusion of Control: Detecting Response-Outcome Independence in Analytic but Not in Naturalistic Conditions120 cited
2005Depressive Realism and Outcome Density Bias in Contingency Judgments: The Effect of the Context and Intertrial Interval.118 cited
1985Continuous monitoring of human contingency judgment across trials96 cited
1985Response-outcome contingency: Behavioral and judgmental effects of appetitive and aversive outcomes with college students86 cited
2012Norms and rationality. Is moral behavior a form of rational action?62 cited
2007Depressive realism and the effect of intertrial interval on judgements of zero, positive, and negative contingencies54 cited
1983Human covariation judgment: Accuracy and strategy50 cited
2002Probability judgment in hierarchical learning: a conflict between predictiveness and coherence49 cited
1985Covariation Judgment: Systematic Rule Use in Middle Childhood

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

42 cited

2003Superstitious responding and frequency matching in the positive bias and gambler’s fallacy effects40 cited

2016Positive and negative implications of the causal illusion39 cited

1986The effects of unidirectional versus bidirectional rating procedures on college students' judgments of response-outcome contingency26 cited

1984Judging response-outcome relations: The role of response-outcome contingency, outcome probability, and method of information presentation26 cited

2003Strategic pattern recognition—experimental evidence24 cited

1986Judging interevent contingencies: Being right for the wrong reasons22 cited

1998‘Attentional Bias’ in correlation judgments? Smedslund (1963) revisited22 cited