Nettleship, Pearson and Bateson: The Biometric-Mendelian Debate in a Medical Context

Alan R. Rushton

18 citations0/0 files storedJournal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

History of Science and Medicine Philosophy and History of Science Medical History and Research

Abstract

ALAN R. RUSHTON; Nettleship, Pearson and Bateson: The Biometric-Mendelian Debate in a Medical Context, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, V

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

References

1974Dictionary of Scientific Biography.2001The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics 2012Materials for the Study of Variation 1913Mendel's Principles of Heredity 1950Dictionary of National Biography: 1931-1940 1989The Dimensions of Scientific Controversy: The Biometric—Mendelian Debate 1995Explaining Scientific Consensus: The Case of Mendelian Genetics.2019The Origins and Growth of the English Eugenics Movement, 1865-1925

Cited by

2005Julia Bell and the Treasury of Human Inheritance 2005William Bateson, human genetics and medicine

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.