The Utility of Systems Models of Stress and Coping for Applied Research

Abstract

Contemporary conceptual models of stress and coping are intricate systems formulations that depict adaptation as a dynamic, interactional process. The inherent complexity of these models presents conceptual and methodological challenges that make testing a complete model difficult. This article makes the case for a more microanalytic strategy for applied coping research that, by centering attention and available resources on selected high-frequency, high-stress problems, permits more conceptually sophisticated and clinically informative analyses. In this context, the prevailing conceptual models have heuristic value for organizing the holistic study of adaptational processes. The utility of the proposed strategy for the development of problem-specific systems models is illustrated using the example of treatment-induced sterility from research on cancer adaptation.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 78 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.