Validity typologies and the logic and practice of quasi‐experimentation

Melvin M. Mark

52 citations0/0 files storedNew Directions for Program Evaluation

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Evaluation and Performance Assessment Advanced Causal Inference Techniques Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research

Abstract

Abstract Validity typologies can enhance our understanding of quasi‐experiments, but they can also serve as blinders. We can go beyond the primary concerns of validity typologies by studying causal process and by being explicit about the reasoning that underlies our inferences.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 52 citations exist upstream.

References

1963Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research 1969The Handbook of Social Psychology 1977Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.1973On the psychology of prediction.1969Reforms as experiments.1975The Philosophy of Karl Popper.1957Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings.1983Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs.

Cited by

1987Improving inferences from multiple methods 1998A realist theory of evaluation practice 1998Review: Promoting Realism in Evaluation

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.