Social Support Providers: Who Are They? Where Are They Met? and the Relationship of Network Characteristics to Psychological Distress

James E. Griffith

76 citations0/0 files storedBasic and Applied Social Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Attachment and Relationship Dynamics Health disparities and outcomes Social Capital and Networks

Abstract

An important concept that has gained the widespread attention of community mental health practitioners and researchers has been social support networks, and their role in help-seeking behavior and remediating personal distress. Despite the plethora of social support research in the last decade, several questions remain: Who are these natural providers of support and comfort? Where are they met? What is the relationship of network characteristics to the psychological well-being of the helped person? Are there gender and racial differences in answering these questions? To address these questions, randomly selected adults (n = 361) living in one of three suburban communities in southern California provided responses to a standardized measure of psychological distress, and also, named those persons on whom they depended when personal problems arose. Same-sex friends and members of the respondent's immediate family were cited most often as sources of social support. Respondents depended more often on women than on men, and on persons of similar age and racial background. Support providers were met most often in such public institutions as school, workplace, and church. Most network members were viewed as mutually dependent, seen on a daily basis, and were known 6 years or more. Of the network characteristics, only reciprocity was significantly and negatively-related to personal distress. For nonwhites, the number of friends and neighbors named as network members was significantly and positively related to psychological distress, whereas for whites, the relationship was nonsignificant. Results are discussed in relation to social support research and the broader field of social psychology.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 76 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences 1982Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.1983Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire.1972Sex‐Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal1 1963The Psychology of affiliation 1973Self-disclosure: A literature review.1981Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students 1979Social Support, Stressful Life Events, and Illness: A Model and an Empirical Test

Cited by

1999Clinical and Sociocultural Differences in African American and European American Patients with Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia 1988Perceived social support in gays and lesbians in cohabitating relationships.2020The role of classroom relationships as sources of academic resilience and hope 2023Einsames Sterben und unentdeckte Tode in der Stadt 1990Acquiring Assistance from Others The Effect of Indirect Requests and Relational Intimacy on Verbal Compliance

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.