SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting Quality of Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Dental Specialty Journals
16 references·16 citing·46 second hopsampled
Reporting Quality of Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Dental Specialty Journals (2013)Reporting Quality of Abstracts of Randomi…Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals (2012)Assessment of adherence to th…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals (2010)An assessment of quality char…The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals (2008)The quality of reporting of t…CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT for Reporting Randomi…Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery (2006)Standards of Reporting of Ran…Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Impact factor: a valid measur…Publication and Related Biases (2001)Publication and Related BiasesPublication and related biases. (2000)Publication and related biase…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…Can the Accuracy of Abstracts Be Improved by Providing Specific Instructions? (1998)Can the Accuracy of Abstracts…Misleading meta-analysis (1995)Misleading meta-analysisMisleading meta-analysis (1995)Misleading meta-analysisQuality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. (1994)Quality of nonstructured and …Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals (1994)Assessing the Quality of Rand…Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct (1990)Underreporting Research Is Sc…Reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation issues (SPIN) in abstracts of orthodontic meta-analyses published from 2000 to 2020 (2021)Reporting, interpretation, an…Evaluation of reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in patients with COVID-19 using the CONSORT statement (2021)Evaluation of reporting quali…Do not make clinical decisions based on abstracts of healthcare research: A systematic review (2021)Do not make clinical decision…Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes (2020)Reporting quality and spin in…Abstracts of published randomized controlled trials in Endodontics: reporting quality and spin (2020)Abstracts of published random…Spin in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in dentistry (2019)Spin in abstracts of randomiz…Adherence of Randomized Controlled Trials to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 Guidelines: A Survey of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2011-2016 in 3 Periodontology Journals (2019)Adherence of Randomized Contr…Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts on age-related macular degeneration health care: a cross-sectional quantification of the adherence to CONSORT abstract reporting recommendations (2018)Reporting quality of randomis…Quality Assessment of Randomized Clinical Trials Reporting in Endodontic Journals: An Observational Study from 2012 to 2017 (2018)Quality Assessment of Randomi…Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials of Periodontal Diseases in Journal Abstracts—A Cross-sectional Survey and Bibliometric Analysis (2017)Reporting Quality of Randomiz…Reporting of critical care trial abstracts: a comparison before and after the announcement of CONSORT guideline for abstracts (2017)Reporting of critical care tr…Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CONSORT for abstracts: A systematic review (2017)Assessing reporting quality o…Abstracts reporting of HIV/AIDS randomized controlled trials in general medicine and infectious diseases journals: completeness to date and improvement in the quality since CONSORT extension for abstracts (2016)Abstracts reporting of HIV/AI…Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts presented at European Orthodontic Society congresses (2015)Reporting quality of randomiz…Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in orthodontics—what affects it and did it improve over the last 10 years? (2014)Reporting quality of randomiz…Reporting Quality for Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Cancer Nursing Research (2014)Reporting Quality for Abstrac…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)Design of Experiments (1936)Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials (1982)Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. (1999)Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2002)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)Multivariate meta‐analysis: Potential and promise (2011)Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients (2001)Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials (2011)Presidential Address: The Scientific Outlook in Financial Economics (2017)Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2004)Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review (2010)A quantitative meta-analysis of neurocognitive functioning in posttraumatic stress disorder. (2014)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Registering Clinical Trials (2003)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
  • 2003Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?584 cited
  • 1990Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct552 cited
  • 1994Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals512 cited
  • 1995Misleading meta-analysis508 cited
  • 2001Publication and Related Biases465 cited
  • 2000Publication and related biases.427 cited
  • 1994Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association.203 cited
  • 2006Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery161 cited
  • 1995Misleading meta-analysis146 cited
  • 2012Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals140 cited
  • 2008The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

133 cited
  • 1998Can the Accuracy of Abstracts Be Improved by Providing Specific Instructions?104 cited
  • 2010An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals94 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes38 cited
    • 2017Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CONSORT for abstracts: A systematic review35 cited
    • 2020Abstracts of published randomized controlled trials in Endodontics: reporting quality and spin33 cited
    • 2019Spin in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in dentistry31 cited
    • 2015Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts presented at European Orthodontic Society congresses31 cited
    • 2017Reporting of critical care trial abstracts: a comparison before and after the announcement of CONSORT guideline for abstracts30 cited
    • 2021Evaluation of reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in patients with COVID-19 using the CONSORT statement30 cited
    • 2017Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials of Periodontal Diseases in Journal Abstracts—A Cross-sectional Survey and Bibliometric Analysis30 cited
    • 2016Abstracts reporting of HIV/AIDS randomized controlled trials in general medicine and infectious diseases journals: completeness to date and improvement in the quality since CONSORT extension for abstracts29 cited
    • 2021Reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation issues (SPIN) in abstracts of orthodontic meta-analyses published from 2000 to 202026 cited
    • 2014Reporting Quality for Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Cancer Nursing Research25 cited
    • 2014Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in orthodontics—what affects it and did it improve over the last 10 years?25 cited
    • 2021Do not make clinical decisions based on abstracts of healthcare research: A systematic review24 cited
    • 2019Adherence of Randomized Controlled Trials to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 Guidelines: A Survey of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2011-2016 in 3 Periodontology Journals23 cited
    • 2018Quality Assessment of Randomized Clinical Trials Reporting in Endodontic Journals: An Observational Study from 2012 to 201722 cited
    • 2018Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts on age-related macular degeneration health care: a cross-sectional quantification of the adherence to CONSORT abstract reporting recommendations22 cited