Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint AnalysisJordan J. Louviere, Terry Nicholas Flynn, Richard T. Carson2010-01-01articleJournal of Choice Modelling724 citationsbronzeNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Economic and Environmental ValuationDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 724 citations exist upstream.References1979Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk1988Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk1972Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior2000Stated choice methods analysis and applications2000Mixed MNL models for discrete response1978Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook1971The Theory of Buyer Behavior2005Applied choice analysis a primerCited by2011A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches2019Designing local renewable energy communities to increase social acceptance: Evidence from a choice experiment in Austria, Germany, Italy, and Switzerland2019Which private investors are willing to pay for sustainable investments? Empirical evidence from stated choice experiments2017Choice Experiments2016A systematic review of the reliability and validity of discrete choice experiments in valuing non-market environmental goods2017The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments2013How to Include Informal Care in Economic Evaluations2011The Measurement and Analysis of Housing Preference and Choice