Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Impact of the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations With Nonrandomized Designs Reporting Guideline: Ten Years On

16 references·1 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
2014Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide10,521 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
2013The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions7,618 cited
2004Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement2,804 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
2008Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration2,290 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2,165 cited
2004A Process for Systematically Reviewing the Literature: Providing the Research Evidence for Public Health Nursing Interventions2,115 cited
2008Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement1,811 cited
2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited

2009Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals819 cited

2011Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study287 cited

2010Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of Science®, Scopus™, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar266 cited

Cited by

2015PAUTAS DE CHEQUEO, PARTE I: CONSORT Y TREND11 cited