SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Systematic Review of Stated Preference Studies Reporting Public Preferences for Healthcare Priority Setting
16 references·4 citing·38 second hop
A Systematic Review of Stated Preference Studies Reporting Public Preferences for Healthcare Priority Setting (2014)A Systematic Review of Stated Preference …Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation (2016)Measuring and Valuing Health …Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force (2013)Constructing Experimental Des…Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force (2011)Conjoint Analysis Application…Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature (2010)Discrete choice experiments i…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making (2008)Conducting Discrete Choice Ex…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation (2007)Measuring and Valuing Health …Analytic Hierarchy Process (2005)Analytic Hierarchy ProcessQALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature (2004)QALY maximisation and people'…Theory versuspractice: a review of ?willingness-to-pay? in health and health care (2001)Theory versuspractice: a revi…Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques (2001)Eliciting public preferences …Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature (1998)Health care contingent valuat…Willingness to Pay (1994)Willingness to PayA Theory of Justice (1971)A Theory of JusticeProfiling Decision-Making Styles Under Healthcare Resource Scarcity: An Interdisciplinary Clustering Approach (2026)Profiling Decision-Making Sty…Recommendations from the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL) (2017)Recommendations from the Euro…Forty-two systematic reviews generated 23 items for assessing the risk of bias in values and preferences' studies (2017)Forty-two systematic reviews …A Framework for Instrument Development of a Choice Experiment: An Application to Type 2 Diabetes (2016)A Framework for Instrument De…An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications (1990)Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making (1996)Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process (1996)STATE OF ART SURVEYS OF OVERVIEWS ON MCDM/MADM METHODS (2014)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook (1978)Stated choice methods analysis and applications (2000)Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation (2005)Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force (2016)Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017)Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level (1998)Stated Choice Methods (2000)Applied Choice Analysis (2005)Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature (2014)Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide (2015)Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior (1972)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk (1988)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Theory of optimal experiments (1972)Applied choice analysis a primer (2005)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures (2009)Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A (2011)Validity and Reliability of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument (2013)Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale (2010)Ideal vs. Non‐ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map (2012)Distributive justice and equity in transportation (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 1971A Theory of Justice9,452 cited
  • 2011Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force2,022 cited
  • 2013Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force1,794 cited
  • 2008Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making1,699 cited
  • 2010Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature1,327 cited
  • 2005Analytic Hierarchy Process1,297 cited
  • 2016Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation1,052 cited
  • 2001Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques641 cited
  • 1998Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature474 cited
  • 2007Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation439 cited
  • 1994Willingness to Pay435 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2004QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature431 cited
  • 2001Theory versuspractice: a review of ?willingness-to-pay? in health and health care419 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017Recommendations from the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL)103 cited
    • 2016A Framework for Instrument Development of a Choice Experiment: An Application to Type 2 Diabetes90 cited
    • 2017Forty-two systematic reviews generated 23 items for assessing the risk of bias in values and preferences' studies22 cited
    • 2026Profiling Decision-Making Styles Under Healthcare Resource Scarcity: An Interdisciplinary Clustering Approach2 cited