SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Historical Opinion: Erwin Chargaff and his ‘rules’ for the base composition of DNA: why did he fail to see the possibility of complementarity?
4 references·0 citing·12 second hop
Historical Opinion: Erwin Chargaff and his ‘rules’ for the base composition of DNA: why did he fail to see the possibility of complementarity? (2008)Historical Opinion: Erwin Chargaff and hi…The Third Man of the Double Helix (2003)The Third Man of the Double H…The path to the double helix (1974)The path to the double helixMolecular basis of biological specificity (1974)Molecular basis of biological…The eighth day of creation (1969)The eighth day of creationThe origin of predictable behavior (1983)Objects, parts, and categories. (1984)The market economy, and the scientific commons (2003)The Definition of Molecular Biology and the Definition of Policy: The Role of the Rockefeller Foundation's Policy for Molecular Biology (1984)Postmature scientific discovery? (1986)Physical and Biological Modes of Thought in the Chemistry of Linus Pauling (2000)Historical article: DNA polymorphism and the early history of the double helix (2006)Model, Theory, and Evidence in the Discovery of the DNA Structure (2008)Do scientists get fundamental research ideas by solving practical problems? (2009)Integrating Scientific Disciplines (1986)Doing institutional analysis: implications for the study of innovations (2000)The Cognitive Basis of Science (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1969The eighth day of creation330 cited
  • 1974The path to the double helix241 cited
  • 1974Molecular basis of biological specificity50 cited
  • 2003The Third Man of the Double Helix46 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work