Reliability of the draft diagnostic criteria for research of ICD‐10 in comparison with ICD‐10 and DSM‐III‐R

Graham W Mellsop · Christopher S. Thomas · Gordon Purdie · Nalaka Mendis

14 citations0/0 files storedActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reliability and Agreement in Measurement Psychological Testing and Assessment Mental Health and Psychiatry

Abstract

The reliability and ease of use of DSM-III-R and the clinical and research versions of ICD-10 were assessed by 5 psychiatrists working in pairs. They diagnosed 60 patients. All 3 systems showed similar and high interrater and intersystem agreement for major diagnostic categories but not for subcategories. A number of implications of these results are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 14 citations exist upstream.

References

2012Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 1988Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 1972Diagnostic Criteria for Use in Psychiatric Research 1989The Validity of the Eating Disorder Examination and its Subscales 1971Diagnostic Criteria of American and British Psychiatrists 1985A Comparison of Two Diagnostic Methods 1964The Vital Balance: The Life Process in Mental Health and Illness

Cited by

2016Variability in clinical diagnoses during the ICD-8 and ICD-10 era

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.