SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Improve statistics in court · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleImprove statistics in court

Norman Fenton2011

Article2011

Improve statistics in court

35 citations·0/0 files stored·Nature

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference Jury Decision Making Processes

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

References

2003How the Probability of a False Positive Affects the Value of DNA Evidence 2011Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T 2010Fundamentals of probability and statistical evidence in criminal proceedings

Cited by

2015Law and logic: A review from an argumentation perspective 2014To catch a thief with and without numbers: arguments, scenarios and probabilities in evidential reasoning 2018Self-Plagiarism Research Literature in the Social Sciences: A Scoping Review 2013Towards a Data Literate Citizenry 2013Calculating and understanding the value of any type of match evidence when there are potential testing errors 2016Interest Groups, the Courts, and Educational Equality 2017Designing and Understanding Forensic Bayesian Networks using Argumentation 2014On modelling non-probabilistic uncertainty in the likelihood ratio approach to evidential reasoning

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2016Bayes and the Lawreview · 2 shared references 2011If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimonyarticle · 2 shared references 2011Avoiding probabilistic reasoning fallacies in legal practice using Bayesian networksarticle · 2 shared references 2013Calculating and understanding the value of any type of match evidence when there are potential testing errorsarticle · 2 shared references 2014Liberties and constraints of the normative approach to evaluation and decision in forensic science: a discussion towards overcoming some common misconceptionsarticle · 2 shared references 2012An introduction to a debatearticle · 2 shared references

Details

Year2011

Typearticle

Published2011-11-01

VenueNature

ISSN-L0028-0836

Languageen

Citations35

Files0 public / 0

ShelfLegal processes and jurisprudence

Identifiers

doi10.1038/479036a

openalex_workW2011697417

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.