The Role of Decision Models in the Evaluation of Competing Environmental Health Alternatives

Albert J. Klee

50 citations0/0 files storedManagement Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Multi-Criteria Decision Making Municipal Solid Waste Management Decision Support System Applications

Abstract

This paper discusses the problems faced by the Solid Waste Management Office (formerly the Bureau of Solid Waste Management) in evaluating competing environmental health alternatives, given a set of decision criteria. The concepts of scoring models are reviewed. Techniques for the implementation of a linear scoring model are critically examined; and a new method, termed DARE, is discussed as it is presently applied in this Office. The DARE method is a rational, orderly procedure that minimizes the number of decisions required of the decisionmaker.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 50 citations exist upstream.

References

1959Introduction to Operations Research.1967Computer Simulation Techniques.1968The Consensus of Subjective Probability Distributions 1965Weighting Multiple Criteria 1965Criteria for Capital Investment: An Approach Through Decision Theory

Cited by

1989A justification methodology for automated manufacturing technologies 1981Project Appraisal Methodology: A Multidimensional R&D Benefit/Cost Assessment Tool 1977The ranking of hazardous materials by means of hazard indices

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.