Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Attitudes to coercion at two Norwegian psychiatric units

13 references·2 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1994Restraint and seclusion: a review of the literature457 cited
2007Interventions for reducing the use of seclusion in psychiatric facilities265 cited
2000Seclusion and Restraint: A Review of Recent Literature177 cited
2009Approval Ratings of Inpatient Coercive Interventions in a National Sample of Mental Health Service Users and Staff in England147 cited
2008Can we justify eliminating coercive measures in psychiatry?113 cited
2005Restraint and seclusion in psychiatric inpatient wards111 cited
2003Staff's attitudes to the use of restraint and seclusion in a Norwegian university psychiatric hospital88 cited
2008Professionals’ Attitudes Toward Reducing Restraint: The Case of Seclusion in The Netherlands78 cited
1985A Comparison of Patient and Staff Attitudes toward Seclusion75 cited
2007Frequency of alternative to restraints and seclusion and uses of agitation reduction techniques in the emergency department67 cited
1994Staff Opinions About Seclusion and Restraint at a State Forensic Hospital64 cited
2006Coercion in psychiatric care: clinical, legal, and ethical controversies63 cited
1998BEING RESTRAINED: A STUDY OF POWER AND POWERLESSNESS60 cited

Cited by

2014Informal coercion in acute inpatient setting—Knowledge and attitudes held by mental health professionals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

54 cited

2019Ethical challenges of seclusion in psychiatric inpatient wards: a qualitative study of the experiences of Norwegian mental health professionals52 cited