SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Acute pain: individual patient meta-analysis shows the impact of different ways of analysing and presenting results
7 references·1 citing·28 second hop
Acute pain: individual patient meta-analysis shows the impact of different ways of analysing and presenting results (2005)Acute pain: individual patient meta-analy…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2003)The CONSORT statement: revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Impact of covert duplicate pu…Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: use of pain intensity and visual analogue scales (1997)Deriving dichotomous outcome …Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics (1996)Deriving dichotomous outcome …Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Top 100 cited publications in the field of third molar surgery: A bibliometric analysis (2022)Top 100 cited publications in…Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? (1993)Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: verification from independent data (1997)Expressing findings from meta‐analyses of continuous outcomes in terms of risks (2011)Developing a database of published reports of randomised clinical trials in pain research 1 (1996)Personalized Automatic Estimation of Self-Reported Pain Intensity from Facial Expressions (2017)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical (1998)Funnel Plots in Meta-analysis (2004)CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Classics of Urology: A Half Century History of the Most Frequently Cited Articles (1955-2009) (2009)Accuracy of cited “facts” in medical research articles: A review of study methodology and recalculation of quotation error rate (2017)The Top 100 Most-Cited Papers in Cariology: A Bibliometric Analysis (2020)Obstacles and opportunities in meta-analysis of genetic association studies (2005)The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) (2005)Quality Criteria for Serious Games: Serious Part, Game Part, and Balance (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 1997Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study699 cited
  • 2003The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials258 cited
  • 1996Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics242 cited
  • 1997Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: use of pain intensity and visual analogue scales219 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Top 100 cited publications in the field of third molar surgery: A bibliometric analysis16 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work