Methodological understandings and misunderstandings in interprofessional research: Experiences of researching transitional rehabilitation for older people

Abstract

Drawing on our shared experience of a mixed-methods evaluation of a rehabilitation scheme for older people in six residential care homes in Nottingham, this paper examines the challenges and rewards of interprofessional research. A social anthropologist, social work academic and medical academic respectively, we explore understandings and misunderstandings that arose during the two-year research process as we sought to integrate quantitative and qualitative findings from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and an ethnographic study conducted in parallel. We identify ways in which it was possible to overcome the danger of fragmentation, which we argue may be inherent in interprofessional research. This includes a recognition that researchers from different disciplinary backgrounds may use different "key symbols" to view the world but that professional knowledge and expertise may enable researchers to transcend such disciplinary boundaries and to hear what each is saying to the other for the benefit of improved collaboration.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 4 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.