Citation map · Study

Improving the quality of randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine, Part Ⅳ: applying a revised CONSORT checklist to measure reporting quality

13 references·3 citing·38 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
2003How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study1,181 cited
2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
1994Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals512 cited
1982Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials509 cited
1989Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis338 cited
2004Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group313 cited
1986A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer.195 cited
1983An evaluation of the quality of therapeutic studies in perinatal medicine67 cited
2006Improving the quality of randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine, Part Ⅰ: clinical trial design and methodology

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by