Age Heterogamy in Marriage

Hernán Vera · Donna Hodgkins Berardo · Félix M. Berardo

65 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Marriage and the Family

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Family Dynamics and Relationships Attachment and Relationship Dynamics Marriage and Family Dynamics

Abstract

This paper examines May-September and May-December marriages--that is marriages in which spouses are separated by unconventional age differences. These marriages are not interesting for their numbers; only about 8% of marriages are age-heterogamous. What makes them interesting is their potential for theorizing about homogamy and its social consequences. Using data from the US Panel of Income Dynamics and a major epidemiological study in Florida this paper compares age-heterogamous and age-homogamous couples in terms of socioeconomic status and marital quality to examine the truth of the popular hypotheses that age-heterogamous couples are mostly from the upper middle class and that these marriages are burdened by problems that make them very unstable. The 4 groups studied include: 1) wives who are at least 4 years older than their husbands 2) husbands and wives who are separated by no more than 3 years in either direction 3) husbands who are between 4 and 10 years older than their wives and 4) husbands who are 11 or more years older than their wives. For all races marriages with husbands who are at least 11 years older than their wives diminished steadily from 13.45% of those making $4999 or less to 6.21% of those making $30000 or more. Couples with wives 4 or more years older than their husbands are also roughly twice as frequent in families with incomes of $4999 or less than those with incomes of $30000 or more. The data also show that age difference is a nonpredictor of marital satisfaction when socioeconomic status race duration of marriage sex and age are controlled. Measures of marital quality also did not discriminate between groups. These findings dramatically contradict popular wisdom and cast doubt on theories on the nature and effects or marital homogamy and heterogamy.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 65 citations exist upstream.

References

1905Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality 1979Time, age, and the life cycle 1972Differentials in Marital Instability: 1970 1979Theorizing about the quality and stability of marriage 1963Sexuality and The Psychology of Love 1953Engagement and Marriage.1981Factors associated with mortality after widowhood.1971Explaining Cross-Cultural Variations in Age at Marriage and Proportions Never Marrying

Cited by

1991The Linkage between Theory and Research in Family Science 1994Spouse similarity for psychological distress and well-being: a population study 2011The gendered dynamics of age preferences – Empirical evidence from online dating 2015Age Differences in Unions: Continuity and Divergence Among Swedish Couples Between 1932 and 2007 1993Age dissimilar marriages: Review and assessment 1996Der Altersunterschied zwischen Ehepartnern

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.