SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Publishing in physical and rehabilitation medicine: A European point of view
6 references·1 citing·32 second hop
Publishing in physical and rehabilitation medicine: A European point of view (2008)Publishing in physical and rehabilitation…Publishing in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (2008)Publishing in Physical and Re…Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles (2006)Citation Advantage of Open Ac…An audit of the editorial process and peer review in the journal Clinical Rehabilitation (2004)An audit of the editorial pro…The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias (2002)The significance of the peer …The ‘impact factor’ – an explanation and its application to rehabilitation journals (2001)The ‘impact factor’ – an expl…The present state of medical journals (1998)The present state of medical …Levels of evidence of articles published in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine journals (2011)Levels of evidence of article…Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Explanatory Secondary Dimension Modeling of Latent Differential Item Functioning (2011)Formulating the Rasch Differential Item Functioning Model Under the Marginal Maximum Likelihood Estimation Context and Its Comparison With Mantel–Haenszel Procedure in Short Test and Small Sample Conditions (2011)Level of Evidence in Four Selected Rehabilitation Journals (2011)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Emerging ethical issues in instructions to authors of high-impact biomedical journals. (2003)The impact factor of seven orthopaedic journals (2006)Impact and alternative metrics for medical publishing: our experience with International Orthopaedics (2015)The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason (1975)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)Going, Going, Still There: Using the WebCite Service to Permanently Archive Cited Web Pages (2005)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics (2015)The skewness of science (1992)Sense and nonsense about the impact factor (1997)On impacts and other factors (2006)Bibliometrics, impact factors and manual therapy: Balancing the science and the art (2009)Perceptions of Scientific Authorship Revisited: Country Differences and the Impact of Perceived Publication Pressure (2022)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation (2011)The rough guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses. (2011)Are peer-review activities related to reviewer bibliometric performance? A scientometric analysis of Publons (2017)The quality of research in sports journals: Table 1 (2002)LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS (2005)Types of article published in physiotherapy journals: a quantitative analysis (2009)La revisión por pares (“peer review”) en las revistas científicas: un proceso que requiere intervención (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles816 cited
  • 2002The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias67 cited
  • 1998The present state of medical journals50 cited
  • 2001The ‘impact factor’ – an explanation and its application to rehabilitation journals28 cited
  • 2008Publishing in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine22 cited
  • 2004An audit of the editorial process and peer review in the journal Clinical Rehabilitation13 cited

Cited by

  • 2011Levels of evidence of articles published in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine journals11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work