References

• 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
• 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
• 1963Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research15,090 cited
• 2021Econometric Analysis of Panel Data15,089 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
• 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
• 2012The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment: Evidence from the First Year*1,672 cited
• 2002Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context.1,363 cited
• 2007Inference with Difference-in-Differences and Other Panel Data1,316 cited
• 2013The Oregon Experiment — Effects of Medicaid on Clinical Outcomes1,148 cited
• 2013Judging the quality of evidence in reviews of prognostic factor research: adapting the GRADE framework531 cited
• 2007Should Meta-Analyses of Interventions Include Observational Studies in Addition to Randomized Controlled Trials? A Critical Examination of Underlying Principles493 cited
• 2010Research Methods in Practice: Strategies for Description and Causation426 cited
• 2009RE: "SHOULD META-ANALYSES OF INTERVENTIONS INCLUDE OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES IN ADDITION TO RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS? A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES"