SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What's Wrong in Computopia?
0 references·2 citing·11 second hop
What's Wrong in Computopia? (1992)What's Wrong in Computopia?‘Crackpots’ and ‘active researchers’: The controversy over links between arXiv and the scientific blogosphere (2016)‘Crackpots’ and ‘active resea…The effectiveness of the erratum in avoiding error propagation in physics (1995)The effectiveness of the erra…The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature (1990)Stealing into Print (1992)Speech, Truth, and the Free Market for Ideas (1996)Knowledge in a Social World (1999)The Price of Truth (2007)Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists (1983)Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line (1999)Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line (2001)Astrophysicists and physicists as creators of ArXiv-based commenting resources for their research communities. An initial survey (2017)The future(s) of open science (2018)Where Does Open Science Lead Us During a Pandemic? A Public Good Argument to Prioritize Rights in the Open Commons (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1995The effectiveness of the erratum in avoiding error propagation in physics42 cited
  • 2016‘Crackpots’ and ‘active researchers’: The controversy over links between arXiv and the scientific blogosphere19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work