SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Data integrity, reliability and fraud in medical research
9 references·9 citing·42 second hop
Data integrity, reliability and fraud in medical research (2009)Data integrity, reliability and fraud in …The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process? (2008)The interpretation of systema…Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth (2005)Suspected research fraud: dif…Researcher Faces Prison for Fraud in NIH Grant Applications and Papers (2005)Researcher Faces Prison for F…Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author (2005)Investigating the previous st…Investigating allegations of scientific misconduct (2005)Investigating allegations of …Authors' reports about research integrity problems in clinical trials (2005)Authors' reports about resear…Scientific authorship (2004)Scientific authorshipCorrecting the Literature Following Fraudulent Publication (1990)Correcting the Literature Fol…The integrity of the scientific literature (1987)The integrity of the scientif…The Unbearable Lightness of Academic Fraud: Portuguese Higher Education Students’ Perceptions (2020)The Unbearable Lightness of A…Reporting of Basic Statistical Methods in Biomedical Journals: Improved SAMPL Guidelines (2020)Reporting of Basic Statistica…Guidelines for Editing Biomedical Journals: Recommended by Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2020)Guidelines for Editing Biomed…Scholars’ preferred solutions for research misconduct: results from a survey of faculty members at America’s top 100 research universities (2019)Scholars’ preferred solutions…Pitfalls and Misconducts in Medical Writing (2019)Pitfalls and Misconducts in M…Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? (2015)Why has the number of scienti…Scientific misconduct: the dark side of science (2015)Scientific misconduct: the da…Unpublishable research: examining and organizing the ‘file drawer’ (2014)Unpublishable research: exami…Ausmaß und Risikofaktoren des Publication Bias in der deutschen Soziologie (2014)Ausmaß und Risikofaktoren des…Misrepresentation and Responsibility in Medical Research (1987)Analysis of Citations to Biomedical Articles Affected by Scientific Misconduct (2009)The problem of plagiarism (2010)Fate of Articles That Warranted Retraction Due to Ethical Concerns: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study (2014)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)ON THE ABUSE OF ONLINE SUBMISSION SYSTEMS, FAKE PEER REVIEWS AND EDITOR-CREATED ACCOUNTS (2016)Academic Fraud (2020)How do academia and society react to erroneous or deceitful claims? The case of retracted articles’ recognition (2020)Scientists behaving badly (2004)Scientists behaving badly (2005)What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: "all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"? (2007)Scientific dishonesty—a nationwide survey of doctoral students in Norway (2013)Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review (2021)Survey Research Methods. (1985)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2007)Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey: Table 1 (2007)Research Ethics III: Publication Practices and Authorship, Conflicts of Interest, and Research Misconduct (2010)The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (1984)The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1985)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)AHRQ Series Paper 2: Principles for developing guidance: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program (2009)Primary study authors of significant studies are more likely to believe that a strong association exists in a heterogeneous meta-analysis compared with methodologists (2012)Disorganized Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: Time to Systematize the Conduct and Publication of These Study Overviews? (2015)Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research (1996)Plagiarism: a scourge afflicting the Indian science. (2010)Clinical trial registration in physiotherapy journals: recommendations from the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors (2012)Clinical Trial Registration in Physical Therapy Journals: Recommendations from the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors (2013)Publication Bias and Research on Passive Smoking (1998)Reliability of disclosure forms of authors' contributions (2006)Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings (2012)Research Integrity and Misconduct in the Academic Profession (2013)Commentary: Fraudulent Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in South Korea: Lessons Learned (2006)Value Dissonance and Ethics Failure in Academia: A Causal Connection? (2008)Research Misconduct Policies of Scientific Journals (2009)Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well (2006)Research Misconduct: The Poisoning of the Well (2006)Publication ethics: Role and responsibility of authors (2021)Ethics in engineering practice and research (2012)Scientific Misconduct (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1987The integrity of the scientific literature163 cited
  • 2005Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth125 cited
  • 2004Scientific authorship123 cited
  • 1990Correcting the Literature Following Fraudulent Publication72 cited
  • 2005Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author71 cited
  • 2005Authors' reports about research integrity problems in clinical trials69 cited
  • 2008The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process?67 cited
  • 2005Researcher Faces Prison for Fraud in NIH Grant Applications and Papers48 cited
  • 2005Investigating allegations of scientific misconduct42 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Scientific misconduct: the dark side of science26 cited
  • 2019Pitfalls and Misconducts in Medical Writing25 cited
  • 2020Reporting of Basic Statistical Methods in Biomedical Journals: Improved SAMPL Guidelines22 cited
  • 2019Scholars’ preferred solutions for research misconduct: results from a survey of faculty members at America’s top 100 research universities22 cited
  • 2020The Unbearable Lightness of Academic Fraud: Portuguese Higher Education Students’ Perceptions19 cited
  • 2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?
18 cited
  • 2014Ausmaß und Risikofaktoren des Publication Bias in der deutschen Soziologie14 cited
  • 2014Unpublishable research: examining and organizing the ‘file drawer’12 cited
  • 2020Guidelines for Editing Biomedical Journals: Recommended by Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina11 cited