SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Science, Legitimacy, and “Folk Epistemology” in Medicine and Law: Parallels between Legal Reforms to the Admissibility of Expert Evidence and Evidence‐Based Medicine
16 references·0 citing·35 second hop
Science, Legitimacy, and “Folk Epistemology” in Medicine and Law: Parallels between Legal Reforms to the Admissibility of Expert Evidence and Evidence‐Based Medicine (2008)Science, Legitimacy, and “Folk Epistemolo…Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification (2017)Suspect Identities: A History…The Randomized Controlled Trial: gold standard, or merely standard? (2005)The Randomized Controlled Tri…Manufacturing Uncertainty: Contested Science and the Protection of the Public’s Health and Environment (2005)Manufacturing Uncertainty: Co…Making Sense of Science: Understanding the Social Study of Science (2005)Making Sense of Science: Unde…Science and the Statistical Victim (2002)Science and the Statistical V…Changes in the standards for admitting expert evidence in federal civil cases since the Daubert decision. (2002)Changes in the standards for …Suspect Identities (2001)Suspect IdentitiesThe Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity (1998)The Greatest Benefit to Manki…The greatest benefit to mankind: a medical history of humanity (1998)The greatest benefit to manki…Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts (1997)Judging Science: Scientific K…Science at the Bar (1995)Science at the BarGalileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom (1992)Galileo's Revenge: Junk Scien…Do We Really Know Anything about the Behavior of the Tort Litigation System. And Why Not? (1992)Do We Really Know Anything ab…The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method (1986)The Politics and Rhetoric of …The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific R…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific R…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)“It is important to reinforce the importance of …”: ‘Hype’ in reports of randomized controlled trials (2019)Longitudinal effects of psychotherapy with transgender and nonbinary clients: A randomized controlled pilot trial. (2020)Examining the impact of sharing COVID-19 misinformation online on mental health (2022)Cancer Wars: How Politics Shapes What We Know and Don't Know about Cancer. (1996)The Cigarette Papers (1996)Ashes to Ashes: America's Hundred-Year Cigarette War, the Public Health, and the Unabashed Triumph of Philip Morris, by Richard Kluger (1997)Organizational ignorance: Towards a managerial perspective on the unknown (2012)NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax (2013)Assessing ExxonMobil’s climate change communications (1977–2014) (2017)'The Appliance of Science?': The Theory and Practice of Crime Intelligence Analysis (2004)Contesting criminality (2004)Counting Things and People: The Practices and Politics of Counting (2009)Facial expression of pain: An evolutionary account (2002)Policy Implications Of The Gradient Of Health And Wealth (2002)Towards a common definition of global health (2009)Embodying Inequality: A Review of Concepts, Measures, and Methods for Studying Health Consequences of Discrimination (1999)Seeing the State (2005)Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction (1985)Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come (2004)The Bind that Ties: Socioemotional Wealth Preservation in Family Firms (2011)The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. (1967)Competing paradigms in qualitative research. (1994)Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies (2015)Estimating liability risks with the media as your guide: A content analysis of media coverage of tort litigation. (1996)Citizen Discontent with Legal Procedures: A Social Science Perspective on Civil Procedure Reform (1997)The Dispute Tree and the Legal Forest (2014)Without Borders? Notes on Globalization as a Mobility Regime (2005)‘Crimmigrant’ bodies and bona fide travelers: Surveillance, citizenship and global governance (2011)Ubicomp's colonial impulse (2012)“In Order to Aid in Diffusing Useful and Practical Information”: Agricultural Extension and Boundary Organizations (2001)Water Sustainability: Anthropological Approaches and Prospects (2010)No funeral bells: Public reason in a ‘post-truth’ age (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions35,276 cited
  • 1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions7,478 cited
  • 1995Science at the Bar520 cited
  • 1998The greatest benefit to mankind: a medical history of humanity509 cited
  • 2001Suspect Identities508 cited
  • 2017Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification372 cited
  • 1998The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity341 cited
  • 2005The Randomized Controlled Trial: gold standard, or merely standard?300 cited
  • 2005Manufacturing Uncertainty: Contested Science and the Protection of the Public’s Health and Environment252 cited
  • 1992Do We Really Know Anything about the Behavior of the Tort Litigation System. And Why Not?166 cited
  • 1992Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom154 cited
  • 2005Making Sense of Science: Understanding the Social Study of Science152 cited
  • 1986The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method152 cited
  • 1997Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts106 cited
  • 2002Science and the Statistical Victim84 cited
  • 2002

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Changes in the standards for admitting expert evidence in federal civil cases since the Daubert decision.
64 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.