SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Promoting Open Access in the Humanities
1 references·12 citing·45 second hop
Promoting Open Access in the Humanities (2005)Promoting Open Access in the HumanitiesPatterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Patterns of evaluation in sci…The case for an inclusive scholarly communication infrastructure for social sciences and humanities (2020)The case for an inclusive sch…Open Social Scholarship Annotated Bibliography (2019)Open Social Scholarship Annot…Preprint for the humanities – fiction or a real possibility? (2017)Preprint for the humanities –…Landscapes of Research: Perceptions of Open Access (OA) Publishing in the Arts and Humanities (2015)Landscapes of Research: Perce…Process as Product: Scholarly Communication Experiments in the Digital Humanities (2014)Process as Product: Scholarly…Electronic Journals, Prestige, and the Economics of Academic Journal Publishing (2014)Electronic Journals, Prestige…Offenheit und wissenschaftliche Werke : Open Access, Open Review, Open Metrics, Open Science & Open Knowledge (2012)Offenheit und wissenschaftlic…Overview of Open Access Models for eBooks in the Humanities and Social Sciences (2010)Overview of Open Access Model…A Matter of Discipline: Open Access, the Humanities, and Art History (2010)A Matter of Discipline: Open …Türkçe Makalelerin Dergilere Dağılımı ve Bradford Yasası (2008)Türkçe Makalelerin Dergilere …Toward Open Access in Ancient Studies: The Princeton-Stanford Working Papers in Classics (2007)Toward Open Access in Ancient…The Research Impact of Open Access Journal Articles (2007)The Research Impact of Open A…Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics (1969)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Alanında TR Dizin’de İndekslenen Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi (2021)BİR SOSYAL BİLİMLER ARAŞTIRMA YÖNTEMİ OLARAK BİBLİYOMETRİ: AKADEMİK GİRİŞİMCİLİK ÖRNEĞİ (2022)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge (1997)Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? (2004)The five competitive forces that shape strategy. (2008)Scholarly Publishing’s Evolving Landscape (2016)Oligopólios e publicação científica: a busca por impacto na América Latina (2021)Giant in Isolation: Online Journal Publishing in Nigeria (2022)A Companion to Digital Humanities (2004)The Digital Future is Now: A Call to Action for the Humanities (2010)Where Is Cultural Criticism in the Digital Humanities? (2012)The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (1986)Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines (1991)The European Commission (2015)Citation impact of health and medical journals in Africa: does open accessibility matter? (2017)University Publishing in a Digital Age (2007)Scholarly Monograph Publishing in the 21st Century: The Future More Than Ever Should Be an Open Book (2008)Sustaining Scholarly Publishing: New Business Models for University Presses: A Report of the AAUP Task Force on Economic Models for Scholarly Publishing (2011)4-1. Open Access Overview (2012)Open access, scholarship, and digital anthropology (2012)New university presses in the UK : Accessing a mission (2016)Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity (2008)Open Access (2012)Growth of predatory open access journals: implication for quality assurance in library and information science research (2017)Dissemination of scientific information through open access by research scientists in a developing country (2024)Hurdles to open access publishing faced by authors: a scoping literature review from 2004 to 2023 (2025)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities (2014)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Open scholarship in Australia: A review of needs, barriers, and opportunities (2020)Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact (1980)Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (1983)Epistemic Cultures (1999)Work It (2022)Pedagogical strategy for scholarly communication literacy and avoiding deceptive publishing practices (2023)Reviewing Crowdsourcing and Community Engagement in Museums (2026)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system790 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Landscapes of Research: Perceptions of Open Access (OA) Publishing in the Arts and Humanities27 cited
  • 2010Overview of Open Access Models for eBooks in the Humanities and Social Sciences26 cited
  • 2008Türkçe Makalelerin Dergilere Dağılımı ve Bradford Yasası23 cited
  • 2014Electronic Journals, Prestige, and the Economics of Academic Journal Publishing18 cited
  • 2007The Research Impact of Open Access Journal Articles17 cited
  • 2014Process as Product: Scholarly Communication Experiments in the Digital Humanities15 cited
  • 2020The case for an inclusive scholarly communication infrastructure for social sciences and humanities13 cited
  • 2012Offenheit und wissenschaftliche Werke : Open Access, Open Review, Open Metrics, Open Science & Open Knowledge12 cited
  • 2017Preprint for the humanities – fiction or a real possibility?9 cited
  • 2010A Matter of Discipline: Open Access, the Humanities, and Art History9 cited
  • 2019Open Social Scholarship Annotated Bibliography9 cited
  • 2007Toward Open Access in Ancient Studies: The Princeton-Stanford Working Papers in Classics8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work