Efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions to promote forgiveness: A meta-analysis.

Nathaniel G. Wade · William T. Hoyt · Julia E. M. Kidwell · Everett L. Worthington

444 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Forgiveness and Related Behaviors Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis addressed the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions to help people forgive others and to examine moderators of treatment effects. METHOD: Eligible studies reported quantitative data on forgiveness of a specific hurt following treatment by a professional with an intervention designed explicitly to promote forgiveness. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted using k = 53 posttreatment effect sizes (N = 2,323) and k = 41 follow-up effect sizes (N = 1,716) from a total of 54 published and unpublished research reports. RESULTS: Participants receiving explicit forgiveness treatments reported significantly greater forgiveness than participants not receiving treatment (Δ+ = 0.56 [0.43, 0.68]) and participants, receiving alternative treatments (Δ+ = 0.45 [0.21, 0.69]). Also, forgiveness treatments resulted in greater changes in depression, anxiety, and hope than no-treatment conditions. Moderators of treatment efficacy included treatment dosage, offense severity, treatment model, and treatment modality. Multimoderator analyses indicated that treatment dosage (i.e., longer interventions) and modality (individual > group) uniquely predicted change in forgiveness compared with no-treatment controls. Compared with alternative treatment conditions, both modality (individual > group) and offense severity were marginally predictive (ps < .10) of treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that using theoretically grounded forgiveness interventions is a sound choice for helping clients to deal with past offenses and helping them achieve resolution in the form of forgiveness. Differences between treatment approaches disappeared when controlling for other significant moderators; the advantage for individual interventions was most clearly demonstrated for Enright-model interventions, as there have been no studies of individual interventions using the Worthington model.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 444 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test 1979Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package 1967The social readjustment rating scale 1988Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis 2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis 1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies

Cited by

2016Forgiveness Therapy for the Promotion of Mental Well-Being: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2015Forgiving the self and physical and mental health correlates: A meta-analytic review.2023The social cost of depression: Investigating the impact of impaired social emotion regulation, social cognition, and interpersonal behavior on social functioning 2017The Effects of Yoga on Positive Mental Health Among Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2017Health effects of adverse childhood events: Identifying promising protective factors at the intersection of mental and physical well-being

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.