Acción vs representación: el 15-M y su repercusión en la ciudad

Abstract

This article seeks to analyze the relationship between public space –the physical– and civic action –the social–. It uses the 15-M Movement as a case study, framed within the global occupation movement. It will examine the self-organization and the use of new technologies and their potential for citizens’ action and transformation of public space, as well as the phenomenon of occupation and empowerment. How public is public space? The research focuses on the two opposing actors involved in public space: the legal and regulated (current planning system) and the spontaneous and often illegal (social movements). The conclusions lead towards ways to achieve a balance between the design of a public space as a place for representation and for action, as both an insurgent and institutional space, halfway between a rigid and regulated design and a flexible and spontaneous one.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 92 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.