Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias

16 references·16 citing·38 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
2007Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis1,879 cited
2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
2000Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences1,293 cited
1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
2008Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses1,117 cited
1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects820 cited
2005Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis603 cited
2001Publication and Related Biases465 cited
2002A simple confidence interval for meta‐analysis424 cited
1997Cumulating evidence from randomized trials: Utilizing sequential monitoring boundaries for cumulative meta-analysis415 cited
1996Large Trials vs Meta-analysis of Smaller Trials336 cited
1997How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data.311 cited
2001

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Uses and abuses of meta-analysis

258 cited

1998Issues in Comparisons Between Meta-analyses and Large Trials253 cited

Cited by

2015Acceptance and commitment therapy – Do we know enough? Cumulative and sequential meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials130 cited
2019Trial sequential analysis: adding a new dimension to meta‐analysis102 cited
2013Trial sequential methods for meta‐analysis73 cited
2012Obtaining evidence by a single well-powered trial or several modestly powered trials73 cited
2021Living Systematic Reviews66 cited
2018Increased risks for random errors are common in outcomes graded as high certainty of evidence63 cited
2020Using Trial Sequential Analysis for estimating the sample sizes of further trials: example using smoking cessation intervention60 cited
2016Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted?56 cited
2015When may systematic reviews and meta-analyses be considered reliable?44 cited
2012A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Identifying Out-of-Date Systematic Reviews34 cited
2022How to perform and write a trial sequential analysis25 cited
2020Trial sequential analysis in meta-analyses: A clinically oriented approach with real-world example24 cited
2020Living systematic review: new inputs and challenges18 cited
2015From Randomized Controlled Trials of Antidepressant Drugs to the Meta-Analytic Synthesis of Evidence: Methodological Aspects Lead to Discrepant Findings15 cited
2010Misleading P-Value: Do You Recognise It?10 cited
2016Interpreting trial sequential analysis9 cited