SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality of Reporting of Clinical Trials of Dogs and Cats and Associations with Treatment Effects
16 references·16 citing·24 second hopsampled
Quality of Reporting of Clinical Trials of Dogs and Cats and Associations with Treatment Effects (2009)Quality of Reporting of Clinical Trials o…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Reported Methodologic Quality…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials (1998)The unpredictability paradox:…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasThe standards of reporting trials in pets (PetSORT): Explanation and elaboration (2023)The standards of reporting tr…Quality of reporting of clinical trials in dogs and cats: An update (2021)Quality of reporting of clini…Incomplete reporting of experimental studies and items associated with risk of bias in veterinary research (2019)Incomplete reporting of exper…Reporting and communication of randomisation procedures is suboptimal in veterinary trials (2017)Reporting and communication o…Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines (2017)Compliance of systematic revi…Deficiencies of effectiveness of intervention studies in veterinary medicine: a cross-sectional survey of ten leading veterinary and medical journals (2016)Deficiencies of effectiveness…Type II error and statistical power in reports of small animal clinical trials (2014)Type II error and statistical…Randomized Controlled Trials and Challenge Trials: Design and Criterion for Validity (2014)Randomized Controlled Trials …A survey of the awareness, knowledge, policies and views of veterinary journal Editors-in-Chief on reporting guidelines for publication of research (2014)A survey of the awareness, kn…Meta-analyses including data from observational studies (2013)Meta-analyses including data …Issues of reporting in observational studies in veterinary medicine (2013)Issues of reporting in observ…Blinding terminology used in reports of randomized controlled trials involving dogs and cats (2012)Blinding terminology used in …Evidence-based medicine in bovine, equine and canine reproduction: Quality of current literature (2011)Evidence-based medicine in bo…COMPLETENESS OF REPORTING OF RADIATION THERAPY PLANNING, DOSE, AND DELIVERY IN VETERINARY RADIATION ONCOLOGY MANUSCRIPTS FROM 2005 TO 2010 (2011)COMPLETENESS OF REPORTING OF …The quality of reporting and publication status of vaccines trials presented at veterinary conferences from 1988 to 2003 (2010)The quality of reporting and …Reporting guidelines for primary research: Saying what you did (2010)Reporting guidelines for prim…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
  • 2001Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses2,285 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2001
The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials
1,426 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 1998The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials769 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines58 cited
    • 2011COMPLETENESS OF REPORTING OF RADIATION THERAPY PLANNING, DOSE, AND DELIVERY IN VETERINARY RADIATION ONCOLOGY MANUSCRIPTS FROM 2005 TO 201056 cited
    • 2014Type II error and statistical power in reports of small animal clinical trials49 cited
    • 2014A survey of the awareness, knowledge, policies and views of veterinary journal Editors-in-Chief on reporting guidelines for publication of research46 cited
    • 2013Issues of reporting in observational studies in veterinary medicine44 cited
    • 2010The quality of reporting and publication status of vaccines trials presented at veterinary conferences from 1988 to 200338 cited
    • 2013Meta-analyses including data from observational studies38 cited
    • 2014Randomized Controlled Trials and Challenge Trials: Design and Criterion for Validity31 cited
    • 2010Reporting guidelines for primary research: Saying what you did26 cited
    • 2016Deficiencies of effectiveness of intervention studies in veterinary medicine: a cross-sectional survey of ten leading veterinary and medical journals25 cited
    • 2019Incomplete reporting of experimental studies and items associated with risk of bias in veterinary research24 cited
    • 2023The standards of reporting trials in pets (PetSORT): Explanation and elaboration20 cited
    • 2011Evidence-based medicine in bovine, equine and canine reproduction: Quality of current literature20 cited
    • 2017Reporting and communication of randomisation procedures is suboptimal in veterinary trials19 cited
    • 2012Blinding terminology used in reports of randomized controlled trials involving dogs and cats17 cited
    • 2021Quality of reporting of clinical trials in dogs and cats: An update14 cited