Victims and Victors: Representation of Physical Disability on the Silver Screen

Rhonda S. Black · Lori Pretes

59 citations0/0 files storedResearch and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Disability Rights and Representation Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport Film in Education and Therapy

Abstract

The portrayal of individuals with physical disabilities in feature films contributes to society's overall perception of disability (Nelson, 1994; Susman, 1994). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze 18 films, produced between 1975 and 2004, that had a main character with a physical disability. Our analysis included specific themes and stereotypes identified by the research literature. The themes examined were (a) overall personality, (b) community integration, and (c) interpersonal relationships. The stereotypes examined were (a) pitiable and pathetic; (b) supercrip; (c) sinister, evil, and criminal; (d) better-off dead; (e) maladjusted-own worst enemy; (f) burden to family/society; and (g) unable to live a successful life (Biklen & Bogdan, 1977; Nelson, 1994). Most of the films developed the personality of the character with a disability. Healthy interpersonal relationships were portrayed in some of the films; however, on-going intimate relationships were rarely portrayed. Many of the movies portrayed integrated community life, but integrated education and employment opportunities were noticeably lacking. The most common stereotype portrayed in the films was maladjusted–own worst enemy; the two least common stereotypes were pitiable and pathetic, and sinister, evil and criminal. In some areas, filmmakers have made progress in dispelling myths and stereotypes described in the literature (e.g., dangerous monster, pitiable victim). In other areas, filmmakers continue to perpetuate damaging images (e.g., asexual beings, incapable of competitive employment or postsecondary education, who as a result of their inability to cope with the disability engage in self-destructive behaviors).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 59 citations exist upstream.

References

1997The Body and Physical Difference 1995The cinema of isolation: a history of physical disability in the movies 1994Disability, stigma and deviance 1986Images of the Disabled, Disabling Images 1998The First Century of Disability Portrayal in Film

Cited by

2024Unveiling affective disablism at work: a structural approach to microaggressions 2024Does Featuring People with Disabilities Help or Hurt Fashion Marketing Effectiveness?2009Breaking into the business: experiences of actors with disabilities in the entertainment industry 2022Disabling discourses: contemporary cinematic representations of acquired physical disability 2013Chronic Illness as a Source of Happiness: Paradox or perfectly normal?2019Positive aspects of disability among college students 2024Negative attitudes toward the majority and perceived hostile and modern prejudices: Focus on older adults and people with disabilities

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.