Does media pressure moderate CSR disclosures by external directors?

Isabel Sánchez, Beatriz Cuadrado‐Ballesteros, Cindy Sepulveda

2014-07-08articleManagement Decision179 citationsclosed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance Corporate Governance and Financial Management

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the moderating effect of media pressure on external directors in relation to disclosure of information on corporate social responsibility (CSR). Design/methodology/approach – The paper adopts a multilevel approach, integrating the institutional, organisational and individual levels of analysis in a whole model that explains corporate transparency. The paper uses a sample composed of 98 non-financial listed Spanish companies for the period 2004-2010, Findings – The results show heterogeneity between external board members. Proprietary directors, representing shareholders, tend to promote adoption of the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines in order to increase value for shareholders. On the contrary, independent directors are risk adverse in relation to the effect that CSR information disclosure could have on their professional reputations. Research limitations/implications – The sample could be improved, including companies from different countries and more years for the analysis, since the period studied comprises a particular economic setting (2008-2010), a global financial crisis. Practical implications – Although these results from the Spanish context, the authors recommend that regulatory bodies incorporate provisions into good governance codes that guarantee the existence of quality and comparable CSR information that favours stakeholders’ decision taking. Originality/value – The image that society has about a company comes from the opinions created from the mass media. The arguments proposed by agenda-setting theory can be managed by companies as a strategic mechanism to respond to society expectations. At present, two of the most studied aspects are the ethical and sustainable behaviours of organisations. These aspects are related to the characteristics of boards of directors, especially to external directors. Independent directors may disagree with disclosing information about CSR practices because they fear that this information would affect their professional reputations, since they are not specialised in these topics. However, proprietary directors favour the disclosure of this information in an attempt to reduce the cost of capital and risk perceived by investors, especially in more sustainable companies.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 179 citations exist upstream.

References

1990Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

1991Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

2010Strategic management a stakeholder approach

1983Separation of Ownership and Control

1980Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm

1997Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts

1995The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications

1986Large Shareholders and Corporate Control

Cited by

2019Board independence and GRI-IFC performance standards: The mediating effect of the CSR committee

2017Mitigating information asymmetry through sustainability assurance: The role of accountants and levels of assurance

2019A systematic review of the business case for corporate social responsibility and firm performance

2019Board diversity and quality of CSR disclosure: evidence from Pakistan

2017Sustainability assurance and cost of capital: Does assurance impact on credibility of corporate social responsibility information?

2016Board of director's effectiveness and the stakeholder perspective of corporate governance: Do effective boards promote the interests of shareholders and stakeholders?