Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Results of diagnostic accuracy studies are not always validated

8 references·1 citing·32 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests1,860 cited
2004Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy800 cited
1995Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good711 cited
2002Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Evaluation of diagnostic procedures358 cited
2003Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study312 cited
2005Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies138 cited
2001Systematic reviews of diagnostic research. Considerations about assessment and incorporation of methodological quality20 cited

Cited by

2008Variability in diagnostic accuracy can be estimated using simple population weighting9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work