SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Probability of a Cyclical Majority
1 references·8 citing·27 second hop
The Probability of a Cyclical Majority (1970)The Probability of a Cyclical MajorityA Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision (1952)A Set of Independent Necessar…The impartial culture maximizes the probability of majority cycles (2003)The impartial culture maximiz…An Empirical Example of the Condorcet Paradox of Voting in a Large Electorate (2001)An Empirical Example of the C…Empirical evidence of paradoxes of voting in Dutch elections (1998)Empirical evidence of paradox…Condorcet Winners and the Paradox of Voting: Probability Calculations for Weak Preference Orders (1995)Condorcet Winners and the Par…The vulnerability of point-voting schemes to preference variation and strategic manipulation (1985)The vulnerability of point-vo…Coincidence probabilities for simple majority and positional voting rules (1978)Coincidence probabilities for…Voter Antagonism and the Paradox of Voting (1974)Voter Antagonism and the Para…Two Preference Paradoxes (1974)Two Preference ParadoxesSocial Choice and Individual Values. (1951)An Economic Theory of Democracy. (1958)The Theory of Committees and Elections. (1959)Building on Social Science: Theoretic Foundations for Modelers (2019)Social Choice and Individual Values (1952)Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice (1982)Unlikelihood of Condorcet's paradox in a large society (2000)On the Rationale of Group Decision-making (1948)A Possibility Theorem on Majority Decisions (1966)Condorcet's paradox and the likelihood of its occurrence: different perspectives on balanced preferences* (2002)Social Choice and Individual Values (1952)Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result (1973)Almost all social choice rules are highly manipulable, but a few aren't (1993)Borda rule, Copeland method and strategic manipulation (2002)Direct voting and proxy voting (2014)A mathematical solution for the probability of the paradox of voting (1968)Condorcet's paradox and anonymous preference profiles (1976)The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions (2005)Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin (1803)An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process (1970)Inverted orders for monotone scoring rules (1981)Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix (2014)The Theory of Committees and Elections. (1959)Democracy and its critics (1990)On Economic Inequality (1973)Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives (2007)Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1952A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision1,556 cited

Cited by

  • 1985The vulnerability of point-voting schemes to preference variation and strategic manipulation113 cited
  • 1974Voter Antagonism and the Paradox of Voting104 cited
  • 2003The impartial culture maximizes the probability of majority cycles88 cited
  • 1995Condorcet Winners and the Paradox of Voting: Probability Calculations for Weak Preference Orders80 cited
  • 2001An Empirical Example of the Condorcet Paradox of Voting in a Large Electorate76 cited
  • 1998Empirical evidence of paradoxes of voting in Dutch elections66 cited
  • 1978Coincidence probabilities for simple majority and positional voting rules65 cited
  • 1974Two Preference Paradoxes1 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work