SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Methods for the Systematic Reviews on Patient Safety During Spine Surgery
7 references·0 citing·30 second hop
Methods for the Systematic Reviews on Patient Safety During Spine Surgery (2010)Methods for the Systematic Reviews on Pat…Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? (2006)Does a "Level I Evidence" rat…Interobserver Agreement in the Application of Levels of Evidence to Scientific Papers in the American Volume of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (2004)Interobserver Agreement in th…Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (2003)Updated Method Guidelines for…INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL (2003)INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENC…Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study (2002)Direction and impact of langu…Development of The Cochrane Collaboration's Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (2002)Development of The Cochrane C…the delphi method: techniques and applications (1975)the delphi method: techniques…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals (2013)Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered? (2015)Psychosocial interventions on psychological outcomes of parents with perinatal loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)International ranking systems for universities and institutions: a critical appraisal (2007)Publication Bias in Orthopaedic Research: An Analysis of Scientific Factors Associated with Publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) (2008)The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care (1993)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Beyond MEDLINE for Literature Searches (2003)How to carry out a literature search for a systematic review: a practical guide (2018)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review (2007)2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group (2009)The Pittsburgh sleep quality index as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in clinical and non-clinical samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)A meta-analytic review of the association between perceived social support and depression in childhood and adolescence. (2016)What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: A multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice. (2017)LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS (2005)How to Write a Systematic Review (2013)How Effective is Cultural Competence Training of Healthcare Providers on Improving Patient Satisfaction of Minority Groups? A Systematic Review of Literature (2016)The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications (2004)Identification and Assessment of Intercultural Competence as a Student Outcome of Internationalization (2006)Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1975the delphi method: techniques and applications5,224 cited
  • 2003Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group2,179 cited
  • 2003INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL1,298 cited
  • 2002Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study891 cited
  • 2002Development of The Cochrane Collaboration's Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials197 cited
  • 2004Interobserver Agreement in the Application of Levels of Evidence to Scientific Papers in the American Volume of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery100 cited
  • 2006Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?99 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work