SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Coping with scientific misconduct
2 references·9 citing·43 second hop
Coping with scientific misconduct (2011)Coping with scientific misconductResearch misconduct: the poisoning of the well (2006)Research misconduct: the pois…Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case (2006)Research Misconduct, Retracti…NSF Fellows’ perceptions about incentives, research misconduct, and scientific integrity in STEM academia (2023)NSF Fellows’ perceptions abou…CONSIDERACIONES ÉTICAS EN EL PROCESO DE UNA PUBLICACIÓN CIENTÍFICA (2019)CONSIDERACIONES ÉTICAS EN EL …Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers’ reflections on reporting misconduct (2018)Is failure to raise concerns …Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol) (2013)Systematic review of the effe…Who is responsible for investigating suspected research misconduct? (2012)Who is responsible for invest…Research misconduct in the UK (2012)Research misconduct in the UKCooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the committee on publication ethics (2012)Cooperation between research …Cooperation Between Research Institutions and Journals on Research Integrity Cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2012)Cooperation Between Research …Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2012)Cooperation between research …Misconduct in medical research: does it exist in Britain? (1988)A survey of newly appointed consultants' attitudes towards research fraud (2001)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Research misconduct: time for a re‐think? (2016)The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (2011)Publication Ethics in Biomedical Journals from Countries in Central and Eastern Europe (2013)Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Editors (2014)When Authorship Fails (1997)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine (2012)Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited? (2016)The Normative Dimension in Transdisciplinarity, Transition Management, and Transformation Sciences: New Roles of Science and Universities in Sustainable Transitioning (2017)Singapore statement on research integrity (2011)Ethical publishing in intensive care medicine: A narrative review (2016)Fraud in scientific publications in the European Union. An analysis through their retractions. (2021)How to Regulate Large Language Models for Responsible AI (2024)Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth (2005)The Ethical Assignment of Authorship in Scientific Publications: Issues and Guidelines (2008)Performance Appraisal, Performance Management, and Firm-Level Performance: A Review, a Proposed Model, and New Directions for Future Research (2013)Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors (2015)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Learning About and Benefiting From Peer Review: A Course Assignment for Doctoral Students at Two Different Universities (2016)Reviewers’ Perceptions of the Peer Review Process in Journalism and Mass Communication (2017)Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey (2018)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note (2008)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study (2021)Post-publication Peer Review with an Intention to Uncover Data/Result Irregularities and Potential Research Misconduct in Scientific Research: Vigilantism or Volunteerism? (2023)A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture (2024)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors (2006)Ethical Aspects and Dilemmas of Preparing, Writing and Publishing of the Scientific Papers in the Biomedical Journals (2012)Personal Argumention in the Scholarly Publication (2020)Pautas para la elaboración de un artículo científico modelo IMRyD (2022)Science: The Endless Frontier (1945)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Proxy failure in academia: More than just another example (2024)RePAIR consensus guidelines: Responsibilities of Publishers, Agencies, Institutions, and Researchers in protecting the integrity of the research record (2018)The Hans Eysenck affair: Time to correct the scientific record (2019)Which Are the Tools Available for Scholars? A Review of Assisting Software for Authors during Peer Reviewing Process (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case199 cited
  • 2006Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well96 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Cooperation Between Research Institutions and Journals on Research Integrity Cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)37 cited
  • 2012Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)33 cited
  • 2018Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers’ reflections on reporting misconduct31 cited
  • 2023NSF Fellows’ perceptions about incentives, research misconduct, and scientific integrity in STEM academia28 cited
  • 2012Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the committee on publication ethics20 cited
  • 2012Research misconduct in the UK20 cited
  • 2019CONSIDERACIONES ÉTICAS EN EL PROCESO DE UNA PUBLICACIÓN CIENTÍFICA19 cited
  • 2013Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol)18 cited
  • 2012Who is responsible for investigating suspected research misconduct?17 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work