Procedures for Estimating Magnitude of Effects

John M. Gaito

10 citations0/0 files storedThe Journal of Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reliability and Agreement in Measurement Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference Optimal Experimental Design Methods

Abstract

Summary A review is provided of methods that estimate the magnitude of effects within experimental designs. Intraclass correlation type procedures are appropriate with any ANOVA model. Friedman's r m and Cohen's power analysis apply to many non-ANOVA type situations, but only to the Fixed Effects ANOVA design. The Gaito utility procedure has two advantages over other intraclass correlation type measures: the coefficients sum to unity (or to 100%), and coefficients for error components are obtained.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences 1969Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences.1941Test Reliability Estimated by Analysis of Variance 1958Intraclass Correlation and the Analysis of Variance 1968Magnitude of experimental effect and a table for its rapid estimation.1966Sources of behavioral variance as measured by the S-R Inventory of Anxiousness.1969Beyond tests of significance: Estimating strength of effects in selected ANOVA designs.1962Testing the null hypothesis and the strategy and tactics of investigating theoretical models.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.