SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Book reviewing in the BJET: a survey of BJET's referees’ and writers’ views
8 references·0 citing·23 second hop
Book reviewing in the BJET: a survey of BJET's referees’ and writers’ views (2005)Book reviewing in the BJET: a survey of B…On Book Reviewing (2018)On Book ReviewingH-Net Book Reviews: Enhancing Scholarly Communication with Technology (2005)H-Net Book Reviews: Enhancing…Current findings from research on structured abstracts. (2004)Current findings from researc…The scholarliness of published peer reviews: a bibliometric study of book reviews in selected social science fields (2002)The scholarliness of publishe…Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing (2001)Disciplinary discourses: soci…Use of scholarly book reviews: Implications for electronic publishing and scholarly communication (1998)Use of scholarly book reviews…Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes (1998)Genre Studies in English for …On Book Reviewing. (1996)On Book Reviewing.Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge. (1971)Electronic publishing of professional articles: Attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry (1994)Scholarly publishing: the electronic frontier (1996)An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi (2015)Hedging in scientific research articles. By Ken Hyland. (Pragmatics and beyond 54.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1998. Pp. x, 307. (1999)English for Specific Purposes (2007)Writing in the university: education, knowledge and reputation (2011)“In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse (2018)To Attract or to Inform: What are Titles for? (2005)Four layouts and a finding: the effects of changes in the order of the verbal labels and numerical values on Likert‐type scales (2009)Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information (2010)Hedging: an exploratory study of authors' and readers' identification of ‘toning down’ in scientific texts (2005)A corpus-based approach to online materials development for writing research articles (2011)English for Research Publication Purposes (2012)The power of book reviews: a simple and transparent enhancement approach for book citation indexes (2013)A machine‐learning approach to coding book reviews as quality indicators: Toward a theory of megacitation (2014)Measuring book impact based on the multi-granularity online review mining (2016)Academic Book Reviews in English and Spanish: Critical Comments and Rhetorical Structure (2009)Introduction: Academic Evaluation and Review Genres (2009)Reader and author gender and genre in Goodreads (2017)The Anatomy of a Book Review (2010)Views on Book Reviews (2013)The critical gift: Revaluing book reviews in Educational Philosophy and Theory (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing566 cited
  • 2004Current findings from research on structured abstracts.120 cited
  • 1998Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes108 cited
  • 2002The scholarliness of published peer reviews: a bibliometric study of book reviews in selected social science fields49 cited
  • 1998Use of scholarly book reviews: Implications for electronic publishing and scholarly communication39 cited
  • 1996On Book Reviewing.27 cited
  • 2018On Book Reviewing19 cited
  • 2005H-Net Book Reviews: Enhancing Scholarly Communication with Technology13 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work