SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Gender bias in journals of gender studies
7 references·15 citing·47 second hop
Gender bias in journals of gender studies (2012)Gender bias in journals of gender studiesAccessibility of cities in the digital economy (2012)Accessibility of cities in th…Scientific and Technological Performance by Gender (2006)Scientific and Technological …Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)Power laws, Pareto distributi…Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Scie…Visibility of collaboration on the Web (2004)Visibility of collaboration o…Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences (2002)Social network analysis: a po…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Little Science, Big ScienceIs higher team gender diversity correlated with better scientific impact? (2025)Is higher team gender diversi…Gender difference in library and information science research (2023)Gender difference in library …The marginalization of southern researchers in Development (2022)The marginalization of southe…Gender differences in the Israeli academia: a bibliometric analysis of different disciplines (2021)Gender differences in the Isr…El Efecto Matilda en la red de coautorías Hispanoamericana en Comunicación (2021)El Efecto Matilda en la red d…Gender Imbalance at Academic Plastic Surgery Meetings (2019)Gender Imbalance at Academic …Research production in high-impact journals of contemporary neuroscience: A gender analysis (2017)Research production in high-i…Is there a gender-based fragmentation of communication science? An investigation of the reasons for the apparent gender homophily in citations (2017)Is there a gender-based fragm…Effects of gender in library and information science research (2016)Effects of gender in library …Who is collaborating with whom? Part I. Mathematical model and methods for empirical testing (2015)Who is collaborating with who…The moderating roles of academic age and institutional sector on the relationship between co-authorship network centrality and academic research performance (2014)The moderating roles of acade…Who Is Collaborating with Whom in Science? Explanation of a Fundamental Principle (2013)Who Is Collaborating with Who…Gender bias and explanation models for the phenomenon of women’s discriminations in research careers (2013)Gender bias and explanation m…Do men and women differ in their use of tables and graphs in academic publications? (2013)Do men and women differ in th…Co-authorship pair distribution patterns by gender (2013)Co-authorship pair distributi…Social Stratification in Science (1974)Social Stratification in Science (1974)Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence about an Old Puzzle (1998)Is there a gender difference in scientific collaboration? A scientometric examination of co-authorships among industrial–organizational psychologists (2016)“A tie is a tie? Gender and network positioning in life science inventor collaboration” (2018)Female owners versus female managers: Who is better at introducing innovations? (2018)Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)Link analysis: Hyperlink patterns and social structure on politicians’ Web sites in South Korea (2007)Scientific Productivity, Web Visibility and Citation Patterns in Sixteen Nordic Sociology Departments (2008)Social network analysis of international scientific collaboration on psychiatry research (2015)Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration (2004)Inequality and collaboration patterns in Canadian nanotechnology: implications for pro-poor and gender-inclusive policy (2018)An intersectional approach to analyse gender productivity and open access: a bibliometric analysis of the Italian National Research Council (2021)Illness perception: A bibliometric study (2024)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community (2005)Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals (2007)Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience (2009)How Accessibility Shapes Land Use (1959)The Ethnography of Infrastructure (1999)Fitting and goodness-of-fit test of non-truncated and truncated power-law distributions (2013)Power laws in citation distributions: evidence from Scopus (2015)The spatial analysis of digital economy and urban development: A case study in Hangzhou, China (2022)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Measuring the efficiency of decision making units (1978)An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (1983)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)The frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Does research collaboration influence the “disruption” of articles? Evidence from neurosciences (2020)Gender Patterns of Publication in Top Sociological Journals (2020)Research policies and scientific production: A study of 94 Peruvian universities (2021)Human behavior and the principle of least effort (1949)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data (2009)Power-law distributions in empirical data (2018)The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science (1993)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Diversity in Plastic Surgery (2020)A Quantitative Analysis Investigating the Prevalence of “Manels” in Major Urology Meetings (2021)Gender Disparity in Abstract Presentation at Plastic Surgery Meetings (2021)Learning by Expanding (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law5,744 cited
  • 1963Little Science, Big Science4,272 cited
  • 2002Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences1,711 cited
  • 2005Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research979 cited
  • 2012Accessibility of cities in the digital economy580 cited
  • 2004Visibility of collaboration on the Web82 cited
  • 2006Scientific and Technological Performance by Gender79 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Gender Imbalance at Academic Plastic Surgery Meetings59 cited
  • 2013Co-authorship pair distribution patterns by gender40 cited
  • 2017Research production in high-impact journals of contemporary neuroscience: A gender analysis40 cited
  • 2017Is there a gender-based fragmentation of communication science? An investigation of the reasons for the apparent gender homophily in citations39 cited
  • 2014The moderating roles of academic age and institutional sector on the relationship between co-authorship network centrality and academic research performance31 cited
  • 2022The marginalization of southern researchers in Development24 cited
  • 2016Effects of gender in library and information science research21 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2013
Gender bias and explanation models for the phenomenon of women’s discriminations in research careers
13 cited
  • 2021Gender differences in the Israeli academia: a bibliometric analysis of different disciplines12 cited
  • 2021El Efecto Matilda en la red de coautorías Hispanoamericana en Comunicación12 cited
  • 2023Gender difference in library and information science research10 cited
  • 2025Is higher team gender diversity correlated with better scientific impact?10 cited
  • 2015Who is collaborating with whom? Part I. Mathematical model and methods for empirical testing9 cited
  • 2013Do men and women differ in their use of tables and graphs in academic publications?8 cited
  • 2013Who Is Collaborating with Whom in Science? Explanation of a Fundamental Principle7 cited