Davidic Polemics in the Book of Judges

Marvin A. Sweeney

26 citations0/0 files storedVetus Testamentum

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Biblical Studies and Interpretation Reformation and Early Modern Christianity Medieval Literature and History

Abstract

La redaction du Livre des Juges est le lieu d'une relecture ideologique des evenements lies a la periode des Juges : cette relecture implique une certaine vision historiographique. L'A. cherche a mettre en evidence la polemique davidique qui soutend la vision historiographique du Livre des Juges. S'il porte sur la periode ante-monarchique, cet ouvrage veterotestamentaire n'en porte pas moins la marque de ceux qui ont connu la royaute de la dynastie davidique. L'A. soutient la these selon laquelle la structure binaire de ce livre (I-II/III-XXI) met en lumiere l'ideologie des redacteurs

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2017Marriage by Capture in the Book of Judges: An Anthropological Approach 2009The Accounts of Deborah (Judges 4—5) in Recent Research 2008The Unheard Voice of God: A Pentecostal Hearing of the Book of Judges 2012Not Just Any King: Abimelech, the Northern Monarchy, and the Final Form of Judges 2003Judges in Recent Research 2013Sleeping with the Enemy: Recent Scholarship on Sexuality in the Book of Judges 2015Left-Handed Benjaminites and the Shadow of Saul

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.