Direct and Indirect Aggression During Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Differences, Intercorrelations, and Relations to Maladjustment
Abstract
This meta-analytic review of 148 studies on child and adolescent direct and indirect aggression examined the magnitude of gender differences, intercorrelations between forms, and associations with maladjustment. Results confirmed prior findings of gender differences (favoring boys) in direct aggression and trivial gender differences in indirect aggression. Results also indicated a substantial intercorrelation (r = .76) between these forms. Despite this high intercorrelation, the 2 forms showed unique associations with maladjustment: Direct aggression is more strongly related to externalizing problems, poor peer relations, and low prosocial behavior, and indirect aggression is related to internalizing problems and higher prosocial behavior. Moderation of these effect sizes by method of assessment, age, gender, and several additional variables were systematically investigated.
Cite this
Noel A. Card, Brian D. Stucky, Gita M. Sawalani, Todd D. Little (2008). Direct and Indirect Aggression During Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Differences, Intercorrelations, and Relations to Maladjustment. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x
@article{a2008direct,
title = {Direct and Indirect Aggression During Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Differences, Intercorrelations, and Relations to Maladjustment},
author = {Card, Noel A. and Stucky, Brian D. and Sawalani, Gita M. and Little, Todd D.},
year = {2008},
journal = {Child Development},
doi = {10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,917 citations exist upstream.