SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews
15 references·16 citing·36 second hop
Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews (2015)Librarian co-authors correlated with high…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies (2009)An evidence-based practice gu…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data (2007)Answering the Call for a Stan…Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources (2005)Effectiveness and efficiency …Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey (2004)Optimal search strategies for…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews (2024)Searching for studies: A guid…Systematic reviews: Structure, form and content (2021)Systematic reviews: Structure…Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews With Costs and Cost-Effectiveness Outcomes: An ISPOR Good Practices Task Force Report (2021)Critical Appraisal of Systema…Characteristics of systematic reviews in the social sciences (2021)Characteristics of systematic…What every researcher should know about searching – clarified concepts, search advice, and an agenda to improve finding in academia (2020)What every researcher should …Music therapy for stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Music therapy for stress redu…Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval (2019)Errors in search strategies u…Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review (2018)Roles for librarians in syste…It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks (2018)It takes longer than you thin…Evaluation of a new method for librarian‐mediated literature searches for systematic reviews (2017)Evaluation of a new method fo…Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Reproducibility of Search Str…Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews (2016)Impact of librarians on repor…Identifying Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Search Terminology: A Systematic Review of Health Systematic Reviews (2016)Identifying Lesbian, Gay, Bis…How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for clinical practice guidelines: database selection and search strategy development (part 2/3) (2016)How to prepare a systematic r…Use of Recommended Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews and the Impact of Librarian Involvement: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Recent Authors (2015)Use of Recommended Search Str…The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments (2015)The quality of systematic rev…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics (2008)Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial (2012)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods (2005)Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups (2006)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education (2013)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,176 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2007Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data4,219 cited
  • 2005Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources2,042 cited
  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2009An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

607 cited
  • 2004Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey422 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Music therapy for stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis443 cited
    • 2019Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval199 cited
    • 2015Use of Recommended Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews and the Impact of Librarian Involvement: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Recent Authors159 cited
    • 2018Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review156 cited
    • 2016How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for clinical practice guidelines: database selection and search strategy development (part 2/3)133 cited
    • 2021Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews With Costs and Cost-Effectiveness Outcomes: An ISPOR Good Practices Task Force Report109 cited
    • 2016Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews108 cited
    • 2016Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study107 cited
    • 2015The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments103 cited
    • 2024Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews98 cited
    • 2021Characteristics of systematic reviews in the social sciences93 cited
    • 2018It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks88 cited
    • 2016Identifying Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Search Terminology: A Systematic Review of Health Systematic Reviews87 cited
    • 2020What every researcher should know about searching – clarified concepts, search advice, and an agenda to improve finding in academia81 cited
    • 2021Systematic reviews: Structure, form and content73 cited
    • 2017Evaluation of a new method for librarian‐mediated literature searches for systematic reviews71 cited