SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Six authors in search of a citation: villains or victims of the Vancouver convention?
1 references·16 citing·49 second hop
Six authors in search of a citation: villains or victims of the Vancouver convention? (1993)Six authors in search of a citation: vill…Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)Publishing by—and for?—the Nu…How many authors are (too) many? A retrospective, descriptive analysis of authorship in biomedical publications (2024)How many authors are (too) ma…How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers (2023)How to handle authorship disp…The vexing but persistent problem of authorship misconduct in research (2022)The vexing but persistent pro…Authorship Proliferation in the Orthopaedic Literature (2013)Authorship Proliferation in t…Authorship, Collaboration, and Funding Trends in Implantology Literature: Analysis of Five Journals From 2005 to 2009 (2011)Authorship, Collaboration, an…Editorial: Self-citation in Publishing (2010)Editorial: Self-citation in P…Authorship trends in the surgical literature (2010)Authorship trends in the surg…Measuring Co-Authorship and Networking-Adjusted Scientific Impact (2008)Measuring Co-Authorship and N…AUTHOR, CONTRIBUTOR OR JUST A SIGNER? A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF AUTHORSHIP TRENDS IN THE FIELD OF BIOETHICS (2006)AUTHOR, CONTRIBUTOR OR JUST A…“Eigenlob”: self‐citation in biomedical journals (2006)“Eigenlob”: self‐citation in …Trends in transforming scholarly communication and their implications (2002)Trends in transforming schola…How Many Neurosurgeons Does It Take to Write a Research Article? Authorship Proliferation in Neurosurgical Research (2000)How Many Neurosurgeons Does I…A Quest for Citations? an Analysis of and Commentary on the Trend Toward Multiple Authorship (1999)A Quest for Citations? an Ana…A controlled analysis of authorship trends over two decades (1999)A controlled analysis of auth…Multiple authorship: Issues and recommendations (1997)Multiple authorship: Issues a…Time to redefine authorship (1996)Time to redefine authorshipWhen authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Publish or Perish (2007)Effects of Author Contribution Disclosures and Numeric Limitations on Authorship Trends (2010)Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article (2012)An update on the “empirical turn” in bioethics: analysis of empirical research in nine bioethics journals (2018)Little Science, Big Science (1963)The Publishing Game: Getting More for Less (1981)Information Anxiety 2 (1989)Turkish Journal of Chemistry’nin Bibliyometrik Analizi (2008)Research universities on the ResearchGate social networking site: An examination of institutional differences, research activity level, and social networks formed (2018)Motivations for self‐archiving on an academic social networking site: A study on researchgate (2019)The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers (1994)When Authorship Fails (1997)Trends in Authorship Characteristics in The American Journal of Sports Medicine , 1994 to 2014 (2016)Where Are the Missing Coauthors? Authorship Practices in Participatory Research (2017)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Changes in Pronoun Use in American Books and the Rise of Individualism, 1960-2008 (2012)Part II: Should the h-Index Be Modified? An Analysis of the m-Quotient, Contemporary h-Index, Authorship Value, and Impact Factor (2013)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)A scientometrics law about co-authors and their ranking: the co-author core (2013)Ten steps toward a better personality science – how quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation (2022)Assignment of publication credits: Ethics and practices of psychologists. (1970)The perils and joys of collaborative research. (1985)Guidelines on Authorship of Medical Papers (1986)Graduate Students and the Culture of Authorship (2006)Best Practices for Allocating Appropriate Credit and Responsibility to Authors of Multi-Authored Articles (2011)Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration (2018)Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989) (1998)Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor (2000)Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals (2002)Bibliometric analysis of anaesthesia journal editorial board members: correlation between journal impact factor and the median h-index of its board members (2011)To cite or not to cite: author self-citations and the impact factor (2011)Gift authorship: a poisoned chalice? (1994)Survey of fulfilment of criteria for authorship in published medical research (1994)The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty (1997)Autoria em artigos científicos: os novos desafios (2010)Author contributions to ecological publications: What does it mean to be an author in modern ecological research? (2017)Whose Paper Is It Anyway? Authorship Criteria According to Established Scholars in Health Professions Education (2018)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Health communication research in the Arab world: a bibliometric analysis (2024)Using bibliometrics to detect questionable authorship and affiliation practices and their impact on global research metrics: A case study of 14 universities (2024)A note on the topic of single-author articles in science (2025)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing (2011)International research collaboration: Novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1990Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers246 cited

Cited by

  • 2000How Many Neurosurgeons Does It Take to Write a Research Article? Authorship Proliferation in Neurosurgical Research82 cited
  • 2008Measuring Co-Authorship and Networking-Adjusted Scientific Impact82 cited
  • 2013Authorship Proliferation in the Orthopaedic Literature64 cited
  • 1997Multiple authorship: Issues and recommendations62 cited
  • 2006AUTHOR, CONTRIBUTOR OR JUST A SIGNER? A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF AUTHORSHIP TRENDS IN THE FIELD OF BIOETHICS58 cited
  • 2002Trends in transforming scholarly communication and their implications53 cited
  • 2024How many authors are (too) many? A retrospective, descriptive analysis of authorship in biomedical publications52 cited
  • 2023How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers49 cited
  • 2006“Eigenlob”: self‐citation in biomedical journals47 cited
  • 1996Time to redefine authorship42 cited
  • 1999A controlled analysis of authorship trends over two decades41 cited
  • 1999A Quest for Citations? an Analysis of and Commentary on the Trend Toward Multiple Authorship39 cited
  • 2011Authorship, Collaboration, and Funding Trends in Implantology Literature: Analysis of Five Journals From 2005 to 200937 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2010Editorial: Self-citation in Publishing36 cited
  • 2022The vexing but persistent problem of authorship misconduct in research30 cited
  • 2010Authorship trends in the surgical literature27 cited